Page 266 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol V
P. 266

western civilization 2043





                 Hu Shih: The Difference
                 Between Eastern and

                 Western Civilizations
                                                                survived the war in a few American colleges, and spread
                 A onetime cultural critic who became a leading fig-
                                                                widely in the 1930s, supplementing American national
                 ure in the emergence of modern China, Hu Shih
                                                                history and becoming required introductory courses for
                 rose to prominence by promoting the use of the
                                                                a great many students.Western “civ” courses retained that
                 vernacular in literature—a practice that earned
                                                                privileged status until the 1960s or later so that a whole
                 him the title “father of the Chinese literary renais-
                                                                generation of college students acquired a modest famil-
                 sance.” The excerpt below describes his views on
                                                                iarity with ancient, medieval and modern European his-
                 the difference between eastern and western
                                                                tory, and the belief that they were heirs of that past.This
                 civilizations.
                                                                was accompanied by almost total ignorance of the his-
                 The Oriental civilization is built primarily on  tory of the four-fifths of humankind excluded fromWest-
                 human labor as the source of power whereas the  ern civ courses.
                 modern civilization of the West is built on the  Reasons for this curricular development are not far to
                 basis of the power of machinery. As one of my  seek. American national history was too brief to connect
                 American friends has put it, “each man, woman  directly with ancient Greece and Rome, the staple of
                 and child in America possesses from twenty-five  humanistic higher education as transmitted to the coun-
                 to thirty mechanical slaves, while it is estimated  try’s Founding Fathers. Filling the gap with British history
                 that each man, woman and child in China has at  was acceptable to many Americans of English and Scottish
                 his command but three quarters of one mechan-  descent, but Americans whose ancestors had come from
                 ical slave.” An American engineer has stated the  other parts of Europe wanted a broader-based past and
                 case in almost the same language: “Every person  found it in “Western civilization” courses. And by annex-
                 in the United States has thirty-five invisible slaves  ing Western civilization to their own national history,
                 working for him . . . The American workman is  Americans achieved a grander, more inclusive cultural
                 not a wage slave, but a boss of a considerable  ancestry than any single European country could boast.
                 force, whether he realizes it or not.” Herein lies  There was a second and in many ways more powerful
                 the real explanation of the difference between  intellectual impetus behind western civilization courses as
                 the two civilizations. It is a difference in degree  they came on stream in the 1930s. Most college-bound
                 which in the course of time has almost         Americans had learned a smattering of Biblical history in
                 amounted to a difference in kind.              Sunday school, and the Christian (and Jewish) view that
                 Source: Hu Shih (1931). The civilizations of the East and West. New York: Simon  God governed the course of events was firmly implanted
                 and Schuster.
                                                                in their minds. But ever since the eighteenth century a
                                                                contrary liberal, Enlightenment view of history had taken
                                                                root in a limited intellectual circle, according to which the
            European superiority to Asians and Africans persisted,  progress of liberty was what mattered most, and libera-
            but that was based more directly on skin color than on  tion from religious error by recognizing historical causes
            such an intangible as western civilization.         with which God had nothing to do was part of the story.
                                                                  Western civ courses offered a splendid opportunity to
            Western “Civ” Enters the                            juxtapose these rival worldviews. By pitting Reason
            College Curriculum                                  against Faith, St. Socrates against St. Paul, such courses
            In the United States, however, the concept ofWestern civ-  spoke to central concerns of generations of students.
            ilization had a far more significant career. Courses in  Choosing to focus on a few great books, works of art and
            Western civilization were invented duringWorldWar I to  big ideas, and showing how they changed from age to
            explain to draftees what they were fighting for. These  age, introduced college students to aspects of the western
   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271