Page 178 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol III
P. 178

inner eurasia 997












            Chapple, E. D., & Coon, C. S. (1942). Principles of anthropology. New  historical arguments at the most profound levels. For
              York: Holt & Company.                             example, the conventional division of Europe and Asia at
            Goethals, G. (1967,April). Adolescence:Variations on a theme. Paper pre-
              sented at invited presentation to the Psychology Department at  the Ural Mountains carries the implicit assumption that
              Boston University.                                Eurasia divides naturally into its European and Asian
            Harrington, C. (1968). Sexual differentiation in socialization and some
              male genital mutilations. American Anthropologist, 70, 951–956.  components, that all Asian societies share basic similar-
            Hilger, I. (1951). Chippewa child life and its cultural background. Wash-  ities, and that a line from the Urals to the Black Sea con-
              ington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.       stitutes the fault line between these metaregions. None of
            Schlegel, A., & Barry, H., III. (1991). Adolescence: An anthropological
              inquiry. New York: Free Press.                    these assumptions bears serious scrutiny today, yet the
            Textor, R. B. (1967). A cross-cultural summary. New Haven, CT: Human  labels persist as traps for the uncritical reader.
              Relations Area Files Press.
            Turner,V. (1987). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites of pas-
              sage. InL. C. Mahdi, S. Foster, & M. Little (Eds.), Betwixt and between:  Delineating Inner Eurasia
              Patterns of masculine and feminine initiation (pp. 3–22). La Salle, IL:  Inner Eurasia refers to a huge area that includes all the
              Open Court.
            Van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage. Chicago: University of  lands within the former Soviet Union, as well as Mon-
              Chicago Press.                                    golia, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia.To group this large
            Young, F. W. (1965). Initiation ceremonies: A cross-cultural study of sta-
              tus dramatization. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.  and disparate region together makes sense only on the
                                                                hypothesis that Inner Eurasia has an underlying geo-
                                                                graphical coherence that has shaped the history of the
                                                                entire region. Early in the twentieth century, the British
                        Inner Eurasia                           geographer Halford Mackinder argued that it is helpful
                                                                to think of the Eurasian landmass as divided into two
              nner Eurasia is one of several geographical labels that  main regions. At its heart is a huge, largely flat, plain—
            Ican be used when thinking about the history of the  the largest continuous region of flatlands on earth. Inner
            interior regions of Eurasia. Other labels that refer to the  Eurasia was constructed mainly from two ancient tec-
            innermost regions of the Eurasian landmass include  tonic plates (the Siberian plates) that joined some 300
            Turkistan, Inner Asia, Central Eurasia, and Central Asia.  million years ago to create a huge mountain chain that
            The label Inner Eurasia is the most inclusive of all the  has since worn away to leave the low Ural Mountains.
            alternatives, linking the fate of Central Asia to that of the  Attached to the west, south, and east of the Inner
            lands included within Mongolia and the former Soviet  Eurasian plain lie several subcontinental peninsulas, all
            Union, and suggesting that the history of this entire  with a more varied topography.These make up what we
            region was shaped by the distinctive geography of the  can call Outer Eurasia. Outer Eurasia includes Europe
            Eurasian heartlands.                                and Southwest Asia, the Indian subcontinent, Southeast
              Using geographical labels with care and precision is a  Asia, and China.The plates carrying modern Europe and
            matter of great importance within all forms of history,  China joined the Siberian plates approximately 200 mil-
            but particularly within world history, for geographical  lion years ago.Within the last 60 million years, the plates
            labels shape how we think about the past and help steer  carrying modern India and Africa drove north and col-
            historical arguments along particular trajectories. Used  lided with the Eurasian plate, creating a chain of moun-
            uncritically, they can warp our accounts of the past, pro-  tains from the Alps to the Himalayas. These offer the
            jecting present-day assumptions into the remote past.  clearest topographical border between Inner and Outer
            Used carefully and critically, they can reveal new aspects  Eurasia. So, at the most general level, Eurasia consists of
            of the past. As the geographers Martin Lewis and Karen  an ancient, interior plain that is surrounded by regions
            Wigen have argued, metageographies, or the categories  closer to the sea that have a choppier and more complex
            we use to think about the geography of the world, shape  topography.
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183