Page 196 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol III
P. 196

interregional networks 1015












            izations dedicated to improving conditions for the most
            needy internationally.                                          Interregional

            Outlook on the                                                              Networks
            Twenty-First Century
            International organizations have been active for more     hile the term globalization implies that prolonged
            than a century in promoting international peace and Wand frequent contact between different parts of
            security. The effectiveness of organizations focusing on  the world is a relatively new phenomenon, such links
            collective security has varied over time, but seems in gen-  have been a consistent part of world history. In many
            eral to have increased following the end of the Cold War.  ways, global history may be understood as a succession
            Whether or not this increased effectiveness continues will  of these contacts. One way of thinking about these
            help to determine patterns of war and peace in the  global relationships is through the metaphor of net-
            twenty-first century. The effectiveness of organizations  works. Networks are arrangements of connections into
            focusing on ameliorating the negative effects of war has  nets, or permeable systems linking groups of points and
            grown consistently, particularly since the end of World  intersecting lines. Obvious examples are the body’s cir-
            War II, and is likely to continue to grow.          culatory system—a network of veins and arteries—or a
                                                                country’s transportation network of roads, railways,
                                              J. Samuel Barkin
                                                                rivers, and canals. Global interregional networks are
                                                                defined by a complex series of interactions, such as trade
                                                                and communications, that span relatively wide geo-
                               Further Reading
                                                                graphical areas.
            Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (1999).The power, politics, and patholo-
              gies of international organizations. International Organization, 53,  Interregional networks have two important character-
              699–732.                                          istics in common: The first is the distance between the
            Cox, R., & Jacobson, H. (Eds.). (1973). The anatomy of influence: Deci-
              sion making in international organization. New Haven, CT: Yale Uni-  various points of the network, a condition that makes a
              versity Press.                                    sophisticated set of governing and logistical structures
            Diehl, P. (1994). International peacekeeping. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
              University Press.                                 necessary. These structures naturally reflect and may
            Jervis, R. (1982). Security regimes. International Organization, 36, 357–  encourage the social development of the parties involved.
              378,                                              The second critical aspect of such connections is that
            Kennedy, D. (1989). International refugee protection. Human Rights
              Quarterly, 8(1), 1–9.                             they are not transitory, but go on for a relatively long
            Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (1977). Power and interdependence: World poli-  time and come to achieve a certain predictability. We
              tics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
            Mearsheimer, J. (1994–1995). The false promise of international insti-  therefore understand interregional networks to be com-
              tutions. International Security,19(3), 5–49.      plex structures for maintaining a semipermanent con-
            Meisler, S. (1995). United Nations: The first fifty years. New York:  nection between two or more points across great
              Atlantic Monthly Press.
            Mingst, K., & Karns, M. (2000). The United Nations in the post–Cold War  distance.
              era (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
            Pease, K. (2002). International organizations: Perspectives on gover-  Early Networks
              nance in the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
              Prentice Hall.                                    Enough evidence exists of prehistorical trade—in obsid-
            Ryan, S. (2000). The United Nations and international politics. New York:  ian, for example—to indicate that some fairly far-flung
              St. Martin’s.
            Weiss, T., Forsythe, D., & Coate, R. (2004). The United Nations and  exchange relationships had evolved by the fifth millen-
              changing world politics (4th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.  nium BCE.The first example for which we have extensive
            Ziring, L., Rigg, R., & Plano, J. (2000). The United Nations: Inter-
              national organization and world politics. Toronto: Wadsworth  evidence has its center in the eastern Mediterranean in
              Publishing.                                       the second millennium  BCE. Cultures in this region
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201