Page 113 - Between One and Many The Art and Science of Public Speaking
P. 113

80                    Part 1  Foundations




                     As our society be-
                     comes more cultur-
                     ally diverse, different
                     ethical systems are
                     increasingly relevant
                     to speakers.























                                        consequences for society are potentially disastrous. After all, the Nazis believed
                                        they were entitled to enslave and kill Jews and other “undesirables.”
                                          Yet, many people endorse, or say they believe in, cultural relativism, the
                  cultural relativism
                                        notion that the criteria for ethical behavior in one culture should not necessar-
                  The notion that the cri-
                                        ily be applied to other cultures. This was the position of the Sophist Protagoras,
                  teria for ethical behavior
                                        who argued that moral laws are based on the conventions of a given society.
                  in one culture should not
                                        Examples of such differences among cultures are easy to fi nd. (See the box “Cul-
                  necessarily be applied to
                  other cultures.       ture and Credit” for one.) So, too, is controversy. Consider polygamy, which usu-
                                        ally involves a man having more than one wife. In the United States, polygamy is
                                        not only seen as immoral by most people, it is also against the law. Yet polygamy
                                        is practiced openly in parts of Arizona and Utah by a small number of people
                                        who believe it is consistent with their religious beliefs.
                                          Similarly, there are cultural differences in ethical standards governing com-
                                        munication. One such difference involves the extent to which people should be
                                        “brutally honest” in certain situations. In collectivist cultures, “saving face” is im-
                                        portant to the good of all society, so people are often indirect and may stretch
                                        the bounds of truthfulness in certain situations. To do either in an individualistic
                                        culture such as that of the United States could be regarded as unethical communi-
                                        cation. Can either culture claim superiority over the routine communication prac-
                                        tices of the other? Not really.
                                          At the same time, there are limits to what most people will accept based on
                                        cultural relativism. Customs change over time as people reexamine their ethi-

                                        cal values. Human sacrifice was once a routine part of some religions, yet no
                                        one today would consider such behavior ethical. Less than a century and a half

                                        ago, a significant number of Americans believed that slavery was ethical and
                                        gave their lives to defend the institution. Over 60 years ago, during World War II,
                                        American citizens of Japanese ancestry were interned in “relocation” camps,
                                        while those of German and Italian ancestry remained free
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118