Page 149 - Beyond Decommissioning
P. 149

130                                                Beyond Decommissioning

         5.10.4 Public attitudes

         Negative public attitudes toward older facilities may also hinder redevelopment. To
         many people, large, long-unused structures symbolize economic distress and commu-
         nity decline associated with unemployment. Where industrial archeologists may see
         beauty, developers see costly renovations, and lack of profitability, for example, due
         to the need to comply with modern building code requirements. Besides, few
         communities endeavor to identify valuable buildings for reuse, and those few cases
         of successful reuse are not enough renowned to convince developers to embark in
         new enterprises. These negative feelings may last even after redevelopment has been
         completed, especially in case of highly polluted sites, because the public can be skep-
         tical about the competence/willingness of public institutions or private businesses to
         fully decontaminate the sites.


         Disclaimer

         Websites accessed on 29 December 2018.
         References


         AMCREF, 2015. North Carolina Renewable Power – Lumberton, LLC. http://www.amcref.
             com/project/north-carolina-renewable-power-lumberton-llc/ (Accessed on 29 December
             2018).
         ANDRA, 2013. ANDRA – ASN – CEA – IRSN, Radioactive Waste Management and
             Decommissioning in France. https://www.oecd-nea.org/rwm/profiles/france_report.pdf
             (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Borrmann, F., 2010. Management of very low level radioactive waste in Europe – application of
             clearance (and the alternatives). In: IAEA Regional Workshop on the Release of Sites and
             Building Structures, https://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/rw/projects/r2d2/workshop9/pre
             sentations/management-of-very-low-level-waste.pdf (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         British Property Federation, 2013. Heritage Works—The Use of Historic Buildings in Regen-
             eration.  https://www.bpf.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Heritage-Works-2013.pdf
             (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Buildings, 2008. Adapting an Older Building for a New Use. 4 January 2008, https://www.build
             ings.com/article-details/articleid/5837/title/adapting-an-older-building-for-a-new-use
             (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Bullen, P., Love, P., 2011. Factors influencing the adaptive re-use of buildings. J. Eng. Design
             Technol. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235307181_Factors_influencing_the_
             adaptive_re-use_of_buildings (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Campagnol, G., 2017. The place of the industrial past: the adaptive reuse of the industrial her-
             itage in the Engenho Central de Piracicaba, Brazil. Built Environ. 43(01). https://www.res
             earchgate.net/publication/314208879_The_Place_of_the_Industrial_Past_The_Adap
             tive_Reuse_of_the_Industrial_Heritage_in_the_Engenho_Central_de_Piracicaba_Brazil
             (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Cantell, S.F., 2005. The Adaptive Reuse of Historic Industrial Buildings: Regulation Barriers,
             Best Practices and Case Studies. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.http://
             historicbellingham.org/documents_reports_maps/adaptive_reuse.pdf (Accessed on 29
             December 2018).
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154