Page 151 - Beyond Decommissioning
P. 151
132 Beyond Decommissioning
Greeves, J.T., Liebermann, J., 2007. How difficult is it to obtain restricted release authorization.
In: WM’07 Conference, February 25–March1, 2007, Waste Management Symposia,Tucson,
AZ. http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2007/pdfs/7115.pdf (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
Health and Safety Executive, 2008. Delicensing Guidance. http://www.onr.org.uk/
delicenceguide.pdf (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
Heritage Council of Victoria, 2013. Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage: Opportunities & Chal-
lenges. http://heritagecouncil.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/HV_IPAWsinglepgs.
pdf (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
Housing Toolbox, 2018. Zoning Tools for Affordable Housing. https://www.housingtoolbox.
org/zoning-and-land-use/adaptive-reuse (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
Hylko, J.M., 2000. Repower instead of retire—a fourth alternative for decommissioning com-
mercial nuclear power stations in the United States. IRPA 9, Vienna, April 1996, http://
www.irpa.net/irpa9/cdrom/VOL.3/V3_127.PDF (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2002. Non-technical factors impacting on the decision
making processes in environmental remediation. IAEA-TECDOC-1279, Vienna.
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005. Selection of decommissioning strategies: issues
and factors. IAEA-TECDOC-1478, Vienna.
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006. Redevelopment of Nuclear Facilities After
Decommissioning. Technical Reports Series No. 444, IAEA, Vienna.
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2008. Long Term Preservation of Information for
Decommissioning Projects. Technical Reports Series No. 467, Vienna.
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009a. An Overview of Stakeholder Involvement in
Decommissioning. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-2.5, Vienna.
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009b. Integrated Approach to Planning the Remediation
of Sites Undergoing Decommissioning. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-3.3,
Vienna.
Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2004. Issues of Long-Term Stewardship: State
Regulators’ Perspectives. https://www.itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/RAD-3.pdf
(Accessed on 29 December 2018).
LaGuardia, T., 2012. Decommissioning of western-type light-water nuclear reactors.
Chapter 19, In: Laraia, M. (Ed.), Nuclear Decommissioning—Planning, Execution and
International Experience. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy No. 36.
MONDAQ, 2006. NRC Introduces Options for New Flexibility in Nuclear Facility De-
commissioning, 21 March 2006. http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/38536/Utilities/
NRC+Introduces+Options+for+New+Flexibility+in+Nuclear+Facility+Decommissioning.
(Accessed on 29 December 2018).
National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities, 2003. Creating Schools and Strengthening
Communities Through Adaptive Reuse. http://www.ncef.org/pubs/adaptiveuse.pdf
(Accessed on 29 December 2018).
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 2006. Site end state definition process. EGR015, 5 July
2006.
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 2009a. Output from stakeholder consultation for the site
end state Dounreay. SMS/TS/A2/1/1/R005.
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 2009b. Output from stakeholder consultation for the site
end state Winfrith. SMS/TS/A2/1/1/R017.
Nuclear Energy Insider, 2012. Decommissioning—Turning Waste Repositories Into Nuclear
EnergyHubs,July17,2012.http://talknuclear.ca/2012/07/(Accessed on 29 December2018).
Nuclear Engineering International, 2004. Decommission Improbable. pp. 47–48.
OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2014. Nuclear Site Remediation and Restoration During
Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations. Paris, https://www.oecd-nea.org/rwm/pubs/
2014/7192-cpd-report.pdf (Accessed on 29 December 2018).