Page 151 - Beyond Decommissioning
P. 151

132                                                Beyond Decommissioning

         Greeves, J.T., Liebermann, J., 2007. How difficult is it to obtain restricted release authorization.
             In: WM’07 Conference, February 25–March1, 2007, Waste Management Symposia,Tucson,
             AZ. http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2007/pdfs/7115.pdf (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Health and Safety Executive, 2008. Delicensing Guidance. http://www.onr.org.uk/
             delicenceguide.pdf (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Heritage Council of Victoria, 2013. Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage: Opportunities & Chal-
             lenges. http://heritagecouncil.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/HV_IPAWsinglepgs.
             pdf (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Housing Toolbox, 2018. Zoning Tools for Affordable Housing. https://www.housingtoolbox.
             org/zoning-and-land-use/adaptive-reuse (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Hylko, J.M., 2000. Repower instead of retire—a fourth alternative for decommissioning com-
             mercial nuclear power stations in the United States. IRPA 9, Vienna, April 1996, http://
             www.irpa.net/irpa9/cdrom/VOL.3/V3_127.PDF (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         International Atomic Energy Agency, 2002. Non-technical factors impacting on the decision
             making processes in environmental remediation. IAEA-TECDOC-1279, Vienna.
         International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005. Selection of decommissioning strategies: issues
             and factors. IAEA-TECDOC-1478, Vienna.
         International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006. Redevelopment of Nuclear Facilities After
             Decommissioning. Technical Reports Series No. 444, IAEA, Vienna.
         International Atomic Energy Agency, 2008. Long Term Preservation of Information for
             Decommissioning Projects. Technical Reports Series No. 467, Vienna.
         International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009a. An Overview of Stakeholder Involvement in
             Decommissioning. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-2.5, Vienna.
         International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009b. Integrated Approach to Planning the Remediation
             of Sites Undergoing Decommissioning. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-3.3,
             Vienna.
         Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2004. Issues of Long-Term Stewardship: State
             Regulators’  Perspectives.  https://www.itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/RAD-3.pdf
             (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         LaGuardia, T., 2012. Decommissioning of western-type light-water nuclear reactors.
             Chapter 19, In: Laraia, M. (Ed.), Nuclear Decommissioning—Planning, Execution and
             International Experience. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy No. 36.
         MONDAQ, 2006. NRC Introduces Options for New Flexibility in Nuclear Facility De-
             commissioning, 21 March 2006. http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/38536/Utilities/
             NRC+Introduces+Options+for+New+Flexibility+in+Nuclear+Facility+Decommissioning.
             (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities, 2003. Creating Schools and Strengthening
             Communities Through Adaptive Reuse. http://www.ncef.org/pubs/adaptiveuse.pdf
             (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
         Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 2006. Site end state definition process. EGR015, 5 July
             2006.
         Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 2009a. Output from stakeholder consultation for the site
             end state Dounreay. SMS/TS/A2/1/1/R005.
         Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 2009b. Output from stakeholder consultation for the site
             end state Winfrith. SMS/TS/A2/1/1/R017.
         Nuclear Energy Insider, 2012. Decommissioning—Turning Waste Repositories Into Nuclear
             EnergyHubs,July17,2012.http://talknuclear.ca/2012/07/(Accessed on 29 December2018).
         Nuclear Engineering International, 2004. Decommission Improbable. pp. 47–48.
         OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2014. Nuclear Site Remediation and Restoration During
             Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations. Paris, https://www.oecd-nea.org/rwm/pubs/
             2014/7192-cpd-report.pdf (Accessed on 29 December 2018).
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156