Page 89 - Biobehavioral Resilence to Stress
P. 89

66                                 Biobehavioral Resilience to Stress

                             stress (Mechanic, 1962), occupational stress (e.g., House, 1974), and social
                               environment stress (e.g., French & Kahn, 1962). For the purpose of under-
                             standing the relation between leadership and resilience, we fi nd  especially
                             useful two models of stress that focus on the “fit” between person and environ-


                             ment. These are McGrath’s (1976) Four Processes model and Karasek’s (1979)
                             demand– control–support (D–C–S) model.


                             Four Processes Stress Model
                             McGrath (1976) conceptualizes stress as a four-stage cycle that involves
                             appraisal, decision-making, performance, and outcome. When confronted

                             by a stressful situation, the individual must first cognitively appraise (cor-
                             rectly or incorrectly) the situation as one that will lead to undesirable results

                             if left unchecked. Next, the individual must choose or decide upon a course
                             of action that is intended to mitigate the detrimental aspects of the situa-

                             tion. The individual then executes the selected course of action. Finally, the
                             individual must evaluate the extent to which his or her behavior and actions
                             are successful in changing the situation. Successful change depends both
                             upon the extent to which selected behavior can have a realistic effect on the

                               situation and upon the individual’s ability to perform the selected behavior
                             or action.
                                Like virtually all stress models, the Four Processes model employs
                             what is essentially a stimulus (S)–organism (O)–response (R) framework to

                               understand human response to stress. This approach presumes that individu-
                             als (Os) interpret and evaluate various stressors (Ss) as demands, which must
                             be met by action (Rs). In Figure 4.1, we present the Four Processes model in
                             the context of an S–O–R framework to illustrate various ways in which resil-
                             ience might moderate stressor–strain connections. As Figure 4.1 indicates,







                              Objective  (CAP)  Perceived  (DMP)  Response  (PP)  Actions,  (OP)  Altered
                              situation      situation       selection      behaviors     situation

                                                (a)       (b)       (c)       (d)

                                                            Resilience
                                                     Facing reality with determination
                                                     Imposing meaning on hardship
                                                        Willingness to improvise

                             Figure 4.1  Possible moderator influences of resilience within the four processes

                             stress model. CAP, cognitive appraisal process; DMP, decision-making process;
                             PP, performance process; OP, outcome process.






                                                                                             1/21/2008   4:49:24 PM
                    CRC_71777_Ch004.indd   66                                                1/21/2008   4:49:24 PM
                    CRC_71777_Ch004.indd   66
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94