Page 189 - Biodegradable Polyesters
P. 189

7.3  Improving the Bioactivity of Electrospun Polyesters  167

               properties of porous collagen scaffolds without compromising their mechanical
               integrity and biostability. The water contact measurements confirmed that
               ozone perfusion could improve the surface wettability of chemically cross-linked
               collagen scaffolds. As a result, water and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution
               could wet the collagen fibrils and diffuse into the structure of the scaffolds, which
               led to enhanced water and PBS solution intake capability.

               7.3.1.4 Ultraviolet Radiation
               Surface functionalization of polymeric materials by using polychromatic or
               monochromatic electromagnetic radiation is a relatively new field of research,
               in particular when monochromatic radiation is used as a tool to introduce new
               surface functionalities [97]. UV-light treatment of polymer surfaces provides
               similar effects with other techniques, such as plasma treatment, modifying their
               hydrophilicity, chemical properties on the surfaces, and so on [98, 99]. The use
               of UV light for surface treatment is a classic application of this methodology for
               surface modification. However, there are significant differences, advantages, and
               disadvantages of UV treatments compared with plasma modification techniques.
               Plasma treatments are generally limited to surfaces but photochemical reactions
               can be surface-limited or can take place deep inside the bulk, depending on the
               UV absorption coefficient at the specific UV wavelength. In this sense, UV-light
               treatments have similarities with UV/O treatments where the bulk region of
                                               3
               the scaffold can be also modified. Plasma can treat wide surface areas, while
               UV treatment can process wide areas as well as very small spots. Lithographic
               processes are particularly suited for the construction of minute structures and
               the technology is a very well known process used in the fabrication of the
               actual integrated circuits. Classic LIGA (initially, an acronym for “Lithografie
               und Galvanik”), based on X-ray deep-etch lithography, is characterized by very
               small lateral dimensions and side walls with a roughness of less than 50 nm. UV
               lithography is a less complex and less expensive alternative to X-ray technology,
               which is able to meet less demanding specifications [100–102].
                Another important difference is the power-intensity control. Controlling
               plasma intensity is generally limited although with some methods such as
               magnetic field confinement, it can be enhanced locally. In UV-photo treatment,
               continuous wave (CW) UV lamps with a moderate light intensity to very high
               power output of a pulsed laser can be used. In general, UV processes do not
               require costly equipment and offer the advantage of patterned surface mod-
               ification through the use of lithographic techniques. In the last decade, new
               applications of UV surface functionalization have been published, combining
               reactive gas or vapor atmospheres with simultaneous UV irradiation of the
               polymer [99, 103–107]. A simple photochemical reactor used for UV-assisted
               modification of polymer surfaces is shown in Figure 7.3.
                Owing to the properties of UV radiation for the easy generation of radical
               species on the polymer surface and in the bulk (photo-cross-linking), UV lithog-
               raphy has begun to be used in several tissue engineering applications, such as
               lithographic microfabrication of biocompatible polymers for tissue engineering,
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194