Page 98 - Biofuels Refining and Performance
P. 98

Bioethanol: Market and Production Processes  81


             Physicochemical pretreatment—steam explosion or autohydrolysis,
             ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX), SO explosion, and CO explosion
                                                2
                                                                  2
             Chemical pretreatment—ozonolysis, dilute-acid hydrolysis, alkaline
             hydrolysis, organosolvent process, and oxidative delignification
             Biological pretreatment

             However, not all of these methods may be technically or economically
           feasible for large-scale processes. In some cases, a method is used to
           increase the efficiency of another method. For instance, milling could be
           applied to achieve better steam explosion by reducing the chip size.
           Furthermore, it should be noticed that the selection of pretreatment
           method should be compatible with the selection of hydrolysis. For exam-
           ple, if acid hydrolysis is to be applied, a pretreatment with alkali may
           not be beneficial [18]. Pretreatment methods have been reviewed by
           Wyman [2] and Sun and Cheng [12].
             Among the different types of pretreatment methods, dilute-acid, SO ,
                                                                           2
           and steam explosion methods have been successfully developed for pre-
           treatment of lignocellulosic materials. The methods show promising
           results for industrial application. Dilute-sulfuric acid hydrolysis is a
           favorable method for either pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis
           or conversion of lignocellulose to sugars.

           3.6.3  Enzymatic hydrolysis
           of lignocellulosic materials
           Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose can be carried out
           by highly specific cellulase and hemicellulase enzymes (glycosyl hydro-
           lases). This group includes at least 15 protein families and some sub-
           families [15, 27]. Enzymatic degradation of cellulose to glucose is
           generally accomplished by synergistic action of three distinct classes of
           enzymes [2]:

             1,4- -D-glucan-4-glucanohydrolases or Endo-1,4- -glucanases, which
             are commonly measured by detecting the reducing groups released
             from carboxymethylcellulose (CMC).
             Exo-1,4- -D-glucanases, including both 1,4- -D-glucan hydrolases and
             1,4- -D-glucan cellobiohydrolases. 1,4- -D-glucan hydrolases liberate
             D-glucose and 1,4- -D-glucan cellobiohydrolases liberate D-cellobiose.
              -D-glucoside glucohydrolases or  -D-glucosidases, which release D-
             glucose from cellobiose and soluble cellodextrins, as well as an array
             of glycosides.
           There is a synergy between exo–exo, exo–endo, and endo–endo enzymes,
           which has been demonstrated several times.
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103