Page 181 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 181

166   Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future


          5 Results and discussion                                      194
            5.1 Human health and ecosystem quality impacts              194
            5.2 Net carbon dioxide emissions                            196
            5.3 Biocapacity                                             196
            5.4 Economic evaluation                                     197
            5.5 Triple I                                                199
            5.6 Sensitivity analyses                                    200
            5.7 Social issues                                           204
          6 Conclusions and recommendations                             206
          Acknowledgment                                                208
          References                                                    208






          1Introduction
          Fossil fuel energy supply has steadily increased twofold from >5300 Mtoe in
          1973 to around 11,110 Mtoe in 2014, providing >80% of total primary
          energy supply for four decades, despite increasing nonfossil energy (IEA,
          2016a). This domination of fossil fuel is projected to continue until 2035
          (BP p.l.c., 2016). Since fossil fuels are depletable, this will lead to a massive
          future burden on natural resources. Furthermore, fossil fuel combustion is
          the key driver of the surge in global carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, which
          reached 32 GtCO 2 in 2014 (IEA, 2016b). As carbon dioxide emissions are
          the major contributor to climate change, several substitutions of fossil fuel
          are of great interest to international communities regarding future energy
          guarantee and environmental and human well-being protection. Vegetable
          oil-derived biodiesel is considered as an ideal alternative to fossil diesel (pet-
          rodiesel) in the transport sector. This type of fuel is renewable and environ-
          mentally friendly, with the potential to mitigate climate change and cause
          less harm to human health (Achten, 2010). However, several disadvantages
          of biodiesel have also been indicated; for example, higher impacts on the
          ecosystem due to fertilizer and other agricultural chemical use (Achten,
          2010), land-use changes (Fargione et al., 2008), and higher net production
          costs (Rajagopal and Zilberman, 2007). Due to both the pros and cons of
          biodiesel production and utilization, scholars have argued about net benefits
          and sustainable potential of biodiesel for years. To settle this controversy,
          biodiesel systems need to be evaluated with an appropriate sustainability
          assessment tool that can consider the trade-off between various positive
          and negative impacts of the system.
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186