Page 339 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 339

Key issue, challenges, and status quo of models for biofuel supply chain design  295


              (e.g., the emissions of several life-cycle stages are set to not to exceed a cer-
              tain cap). For example, Bernardi et al. set a GHG cap as a constraint based on
              the European Union’s goal of GHG reduction (Bernardi et al., 2013).
              Sammons Jr et al. (2007) proposed a framework for biorefinery product allo-
              cation where the environmental impacts were modeled as constraints after
              the first stage optimization with an economic objective function. In some
              studies, the results of LCA were used as one of the multiple objective func-
              tions. For example, Akgul et al. (2012a) developed a multiobjective function
              model for wheat, wheat straw, and miscanthus to bioethanol in the United
              Kingdom, where two objective functions were minimizing GHG emissions
              and the SC daily cost. You and Wang (2011) developed an optimal design of
              the BSC with the economic and environmental criteria considering the var-
              iability and seasonality in feedstocks, biomass degradation, and geographic
              diversity (You and Wang, 2011). Some other studies used a single objective
              function that integrates LCA with economic analysis or other criteria using
              Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) (Kanzian et al., 2013;
              Bernardi et al., 2013; Eskandarpour et al., 2015). For example, Bernardi
              et al. adopted the weighted summation of three objective functions,
              namely, NPV, GHG emissions, and water footprints (Bernardi et al.,
              2013; Eskandarpour et al., 2015).
                 As the development of biofuel has potential to create new jobs and thrive
              the economy in rural areas, social impacts such as job creation have been
              included in previous studies (Bamufleh et al., 2013; Lira-Barraga ´n et al.,
              2013). Among different factors that have been used to quantify the social
              impacts (e.g., indicators on diversity, physical working condition, job
              creation, and local community acceptance) ( Jørgensen et al., 2008), job cre-
              ation is one of the most common indicators considered in previous optimi-
              zation studies. The U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
              has developed the jobs and economic development impact (JEDI) models
              that can quantify the job creations due to the construction and operation
              of biofuels at local and state levels (NREL, 2012). JEDI was developed based
              on IMPLAN (economic impact analysis for planning) that uses the input-
              output method to evaluate three economic impacts of a specific activity,
              including direct impact (e.g., on-site labor), local revenue and supply chains,
              and induced effect (e.g., increasing local business due to the development
              of BSC) (Taylor et al., 1993; Rickman and Schwer, 1995). Some studies
              integrated JEDI and IMPLAN with optimization models in BSC design
              to couple the job creation with other objective functions related to eco-
              nomic and environmental benefits (Yue et al., 2014; Ayoub et al., 2009).
   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344