Page 345 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 345

Key issue, challenges, and status quo of models for biofuel supply chain design  301


              ABM to model the system dynamic with farms’ and biorefineries’ adaptive
              decisions in the BSC network. By simulating different scenarios (e.g., dif-
              ferent policy incentives), the results showed the dynamics of biomass
              resource adaption and corresponding effects on the biorefinery and crop
              contracts. Agusdinata et al. (2014) applied ABM to BSC network simulation
              to study system behaviors of users, biorefineries, and farmers. The results
              showed that the network was sensitive to the information time delay
              between different stakeholders. Kempener et al. (2009) used ABM to sim-
              ulate a complex adaptive system for designing the bioenergy network with
              combined optimization and simulation approach. This model provided
              decisions on network performance and impacts of policy enforcement on
              the BSC. Scheffran and BenDor (2009) developed an ABM model with spa-
              tial dynamic powered by GIS to study the BSC and corresponding land use
              pattern change in Illinois. Results showed that with expanding demand for
              bioenergy, farmers adopted more energy crops, which further changes the
              local land use pattern. As ABM can simulate the decision-making of each
              component of BSC (e.g., farms, inventory sites, biorefineries) and other
              organizations (e.g., government agencies), the BSC evolution, network per-
              formance, trade-offs, and complex system adaptation can be evaluated under
              different policies, economic, and technical conditions. So far most of previ-
              ous studies focused on stakeholders such as farms and biorefineries while
              some included policy incentives from government. Given the complexity
              of BSC, stakeholders at multiple scales and levels (e.g., government, food
              companies, manufacturers, farms, customers) may need to be included to
              better address BSC design problems through ABM. In addition, most of pre-
              vious ABM studies focused on understanding the economic implications of
              BSC, a potential use of ABM in the future is to take sustainability of BSC,
              especially environmental and social sustainability, into consideration (Gold
              and Seuring, 2011).


              5 Challenges and issues in BSC design
              5.1 Technical challenges and issues related to BSC component

              Although intensive efforts have been made on BSC design and modeling in
              the past decades, many challenges still exist. One major challenge is the
              uncertainty. For example, choosing the locations and capacities of prepro-
              cessing and processing sites is a widely studied topic. However, location
              selections and configuration design (e.g., centralized or decentralized) still
              needs case-by-case analysis that depends on the availability of different
   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350