Page 363 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 363

320   Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future


          methods (fuzzy ELECTRE and fuzzy PROMETHEE), and fuzzy
          weighting methods. MODM techniques combined with fuzzy set theory
          are also a major part of FMCDM, such as fuzzy multiobjective linear pro-
          gramming, quasiconcave and nonconcave fuzzy multiobjective program-
          ming,   interactive  fuzzy  stochastic  linear  programming,  fuzzy
          multiobjective integer goal programming, gray fuzzy multiobjective opti-
          mization, and fuzzy multiobjective geometric programming (Kahraman,
          2008). The method applied in this research is a kind of fuzzy multiobjec-
          tive programming approach. Framework for the FMCDM method is
          shown in Fig. 11.1.



          2.1 Fuzzy concept
          Fuzzy set theory had been introduced by Zadeh (1965), and many improved
          fuzzy methods have been developed to be used in many fields such as opti-
          mization of multiobjective problem and multicriteria decision making
          (Wang and Chen, 2011; Chen et al., 2011; Bajpai et al., 2010).
          Definition 1 Fuzzy sets (Khrais et al., 2011)
          Assume that X is a collection of objects presented by x, a fuzz set α in X is a
          set of ordered pairs defined as shown in Eq. (11.1), and the bigger the value
          of the membership function, it will be more certain that x belongs to α.


                                         α
                                α ¼ ð f  x, μ xðÞÞj x 2 Xg            (11.1)
          where μ α (x) is the membership function of x in α.
          Definition 2 Triangular fuzzy numbers (Tsai and Hsiao, 2004)
          The triangular Fuzzy number is usually used in fuzzy study, and e can be
                                                                   a
                              L  M   U
          defined by a triplet (a , a , a ). Its mathematical and graphic concepts
          are shown in Eq. (11.2) and Fig. 11.2, respectively.
                                   8                 L
                                         0      x   a
                                   >
                                   >       L
                                   >  x a
                                   >           L       M
                                   >
                                   <          a < x   a
                                       M
                                      a  a L
                             e a      x a
                            μ xðÞ ¼        U                          (11.2)
                                   >           M       U
                                   >          a < x   a
                                   >
                                       M
                                   >  a  a U
                                   >
                                   :                 U
                                         0      x > a
          Definition 3 Arithmetic operations (Chang, 1996; Yuen and Lau, 2011;
          Chen, 2000)
   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368