Page 62 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 62

56    Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future


             Another recent review by McCollum et al. (2018), unveiled that there
          are knowledge gaps regarding the interactions between the energy SDG tar-
          gets and those of the non energy-focused SDGs, including their context
          dependencies (relating to time, geography, governance, technology, and
          directionality). This requires further efforts to promote policy coherence
          and integrated assessments to assess potential policy spillovers across sectors,
          different sustainability domains, and issues associated to geographic and tem-
          poral boundaries. Indeed, the debate on the importance of interlinkages
          between SDGs and the interactions due to geographical context, resource
          endowments, time horizon, and governance is open (Nilsson et al., 2018).




          4 Environmental sustainability
          The economic, social, and economic pillars of the sustainability should be
          assessed in a quantitative or semiquantitative manner. This requires the
          use of specific methods and models to allow the comparison of alternative
          solutions and the appraisal of the absolute impacts and performance associ-
          ated to a studied system.
             Sala et al. (2015a) compared several approaches in order to highlight
          those that may be considered more suitable for conducting sustainability
          assessment. From this assessment, it emerged that life cycle thinking and life
          cycle assessment (LCA) are vital elements of sustainability assessment and
          increasingly mentioned as being essential for informing decisions in a com-
          prehensive and holistic manner, in both business and policy contexts (Sala
          et al., 2013a,b).
             While LCA focuses primarily onburdens linked to emissions into the envi-
          ronment and resources, life cycle costing (LCC) aims at assessing cost along the
          supplychainandtheemergingsociallifecycleassessment(SLCA)complements
          thisinrelationtoworkinghours/conditionsandsocialdomainstocompletethe
          environment and socioeconomic analysis. Aiming to cover the different pillars
          of sustainability, life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) methodologies and
          applications are under development aiming at integrating better the sustain-
          abilitypillars,whileassessingthemutualinteractionamongthem.Fromthelite-
          rature and the LCA practice, it is clear that LCA is a methodology, which may
          complement other methodologies and insights, for assessing the performance
          of goods/ services/ systems/ technologies/ innovations/ infrastructures/ waste
          management options/ regions. While the application of LCA in the context of
          business has a longer tradition (starting in the 1970s), the array of options for
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67