Page 66 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 66

Triple bottom line, sustainability and sustainability assessment, an overview  59


              example, bioeconomy, circular economy, resources efficiency, eco-
              innovation, and sustainable production and consumption. This calls for
              reflecting upon current and future challenges of the application of LCA
              as decision support tool.
                 LCT and LCA have a strong link with the sustainable development goals
              (SDGs) mentioned before. In fact, LCT and LCA may play a role in assessing
              impacts and benefits associated to several goals, both environmental and
              socioeconomic ones. For example, through LCA it is possible to account
              for climate change-related drivers of impact and the associated potential
              damage to ecosystems due to production and consumption patterns. Simi-
              larly, the assessment framework may cover impact on water, land, resources,
              and so on. When life cycle thinking is applied to social issues (social LCA),
              the supply chains related impact could be assessed, for example, those related
              to poverty or inequalities (see section on social sustainability). Moreover, at
              European level, LCA is considered the best framework for assessing the
              potential environmental impacts of products, process, and systems, for
              example, in the context of the European Environmental Footprint for
              products (PEF) and organizations (OEF) (CEC, 2013a,b).
                 The literature on the application of LCA to biofuels has been thriving
                                                                  ¸
              over the last 10years (see, e.g., Martin et al., 2015; Malca and Freire,
              2011) basically highlighting the main trade-offs and the need of specific
              methodological improvements to be able to comprehensively assess the
              environmental sustainability of biofuels production and use.
                 Often the LCA studies are coupled with models and concepts coming
              from other disciplines, for example, with economic modeling (Panichelli
              and Gnansounou, 2017), cost-benefit analysis (Møller et al., 2014), process
              optimization (van Boxtel et al., 2015), and so on.
                 Some of the key and most challenging aspects to be further developed
              for improving environmental sustainability assessment are reported in the
              following sections.


              4.2 Comprehensive evaluation of environmental impacts

              The Life cycle impact assessment step seeks to comprehensively address
              environmental impacts, unveiling trade-offs among impact categories. Usu-
              ally, in LCA practice, at least 16 different impact categories are taken into
              account, such as: climate change; acidification; eutrophication, terrestrial;
              eutrophication, marine; eutrophication, freshwater; particulate matter;
              photochemical ozone formation; human toxicity, cancer; human toxicity,
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71