Page 217 - Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis And Torrefaction Practical Design and Theory
P. 217

194                          Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction



              TABLE 6.6 Range of Tar Removal by Different Physical Separation
              Methods
              Physical Methods          Tar Removal (%)     References
              Sand bed filter           50 97               Hasler (1999)
              Venturi scrubber          50 90               Han and Kim (2008)
              Rotational particle separator  30 70          Han and Kim (2008)
              Wash tower                10 25               Han and Kim (2008)
              Wet ESP                   50 70               Paasen (2004)
              Fabric filter             0 50                Han and Kim (2008)
              Catalytic tar cracker     .95                 Hasler (1999)



               The size distribution of the inlet particulates is difficult to measure, espe-
            cially for finer particulates, but its measurement is important in choosing the
            right collection devices. For example, submicron (,1 μm) particulates need a
            wet ESPs, but this device is significantly more expensive than others. A fab-
            ric filter may work for fines, but it may fail if there is any chance of
            condensation.

            Cyclones
            Cyclones are not very effective for tar removal because of the tar’s stickiness
            and because cyclones cannot remove small (,1 μm) tar droplets (Knoef,
            2005, p. 196). It is however effective in removing particulates from the prod-
            uct gas.


            Barrier Filters
            Barrier filters present a physical barrier in the path of tar and particulates
            while allowing the clean gas to pass through. One of their special features is
            that they allow coating of their surface with appropriate catalytic agents to
            facilitate tar cracking. These filters are of two types: candle and fabric.
               Candle filters are porous, ceramic, or metallic. The porosity of the mate-
            rial is chosen such that the finest particles do not pass through. Particles fail-
            ing to pass through the filter barrier deposit on the wall (Figure 6.7), forming
            a porous layer of solids called a “filter cake.” Gas passes through the porous
            layer as well as through the filter. One major problem with the filter cake is
            that as it grows in thickness, the pressure drop across the filter increases.
            Thus, provision is made for its occasional removal. A popular means of
            removal is pressure pulse in opposite directions.
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222