Page 177 - Biomimetics : Biologically Inspired Technologies
P. 177

Bar-Cohen : Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies DK3163_c005 Final Proof page 163 6.9.2005 12:11pm




                    Genetic Algorithms in Optimization Models                                   163

                    effect genetic diversity has on evolution. Some researchers refer to this modification as injection.
                    Salhi and Gamal (2003) propose to inject into the population once in a while a few chromosomes,
                    which are either randomly generated or obtained from another heuristic. The injection rate is not
                    necessarily constant but can slightly decrease with the number of generations.
                      Invasion is also common in nature in the distribution of plants and animals. In such cases,
                    competition for resources ensues. This competition with the invading species may signal the
                    extinction of the native species if they are less fit.

                    5.3.6 Gender

                    In nature, most advanced species require two genders in order to mate and reproduce. The gender
                    modification attempts to mimic this natural process. One can argue that the division into two
                    genders was selected over time as the preferred way for producing offspring and is therefore
                    superior to other possible mating schemes. In gender-specific genetic algorithms, the diversity of
                    the population is better maintained with no detrimental effects on run time.
                      It is easy to ‘‘convert’’ a given genetic algorithm to a gender-specific one. Three minor
                    modifications are suggested (Drezner and Drezner, 2005):

                    1.   When the starting population is generated, half the population members are designated as males and
                         half are designated as females. The assignment of gender is done at random and no characteristic of
                         the population member is used for such determination.
                    2.   When selecting two parents, the first parent is randomly selected while the second is randomly
                         selected from the pool of the opposite gender.
                    3.   When an offspring is generated, it is randomly assigned a gender with a 50% probability of being
                         assigned a male gender and 50% probability a female. Again, no characteristic of the offspring
                         should be used to determine its gender.
                      No extra effort is required for the implementation of the gender-specific modification. A vector
                    of genders for population members needs to be maintained, along with the gender determined for
                    each offspring. In Drezner and Drezner (2005) it has been statistically shown that the gender-
                    specific algorithm significantly improves the solutions on four sets of problems.
                      Note that it is important that an offspring’s gender is randomly determined. An early attempt
                    (Allenson, 1992) for the gender line a modification failed because it was suggested that the
                    offspring is assigned the gender of the discarded population member. The rationale for his rule is
                    to keep the population half males and half females. But this rule is inconsistent with nature. The
                    concern is that if the population becomes all males or all females no further evolution is possible.
                    The evolutionary process must be terminated prematurely if such a population structure evolves. In
                    Drezner and Drezner (2005), it is shown that for a sufficiently large population (50 or more
                    members), the probability that all population members will have the same gender is extremely
                    low and can be ignored.

                    5.3.7 Distance-Based Parent Selection

                    All human cultures prohibit marriage between siblings or between parents and children (genetically
                    similar pairs). In societies where marriages are arranged, similarity in socio-economic standing, but
                    not genetic make-up, is prevalent. Some plants avoid pollination from genetically similar or
                    identical individuals because self-pollination or pollination by ‘‘siblings’’ is typically unsuccessful,
                    a phenomenon referred to in biology as ‘‘inbreeding depression.’’ Mating between close relatives
                    often results in less fit offspring. Another, less well known biological fact, is that mating between
                    genetically distant members of the same species can lead to a decline in offspring fitness, a
                    condition known as ‘‘outbreeding depression’’ or ‘‘hybrid breakdown.’’ Some species avoid pol-
                    lination from individuals that are geographically distant or genetically dissimilar, as offspring
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182