Page 196 - Biomimetics : Biologically Inspired Technologies
P. 196

Bar-Cohen : Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies DK3163_c006 Final Proof page 182 21.9.2005 2:56am




                    182                                     Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies

                    locomotion. And so the visco-elastic biomaterials serve several functions during locomotion:
                    absorbing shock, stabilizing, and improving locomotion energy efficiency (Full and Meijer, 1999).
                       Moreover, the resonance of the compliant biomaterials appears to perform as the oscillating
                    elements of analog computers, dynamically stabilizing animal locomotion in response to the
                    terrain — a low-level intelligence function labeled ‘‘preflex’’ by Brown et al. (1996). Note that
                    such preflex would function separately from nerve activity, involving only well-tuned mechanical
                    compliance.
                       In a dramatic display of this principle transferred into a robot, Stanford’s Sprawlita robots
                    traverse highly complex terrain with no sensor feedback at all, stabilized only by the feedforward-
                    responsive, rubbery compliance of its body and legs (Kim et al., 2004). The latest robot in the
                    Sprawl series, the small (0.3 kg) autonomous iSprawl runs at 15 body lengths per second — several
                    times faster than earlier, slower bio-inspired robots (see Figure 6.2). And yet examination and
                    analysis of iSprawl shows the same bouncing, stable locomotion patterns in as those seen in insects
                    (Kim et al., 2004).
                       Comparable to iSprawl, the Mini-Whegsy of Case Western Reserve University is smaller and
                    lighter than iSprawl, predates iSprawl and runs at 10 body lengths per second. Mini-Whegs also run
                    rapidly over obstacles that are taller than their legs. The Whegs robots are discussed further in the
                    next section.
                       Full and Meijer (1999) show that the principles of compliant locomotion hold regardless of leg
                    number, but with some variations. Full and Meijer also find that in locomotion with four or more
                    legs, the leading two legs absorb shock and stabilize an animal, while the rear two legs provide
                    propulsion. In animals with six or more legs, the middle legs provide combined propulsion and
                    stabilization. In animals with two legs or mono-style hoppers (like a kangaroo), the legs serve for
                    both shock absorption and propulsion.
                       Implementing these biological strategies will be more challenging in biped robots, so, many
                    researchers are initially implementing them in hexapod robots. Such an insect-like hexapod
                    architecture offers inherent stability, especially when employed with a ground-hugging, sprawl-
                    legged posture. One sees such a posture in lizards, crabs, cockroaches, and spiders. Both the































                    Figure 6.2  Stanford’s dynamically stable iSprawl. (Image courtesy of Stanford’s Biomimetic Robotics
                    Laboratory.)
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201