Page 25 - Biorefinery 2030 Future Prospects for the Bioeconomy (2015)

xxiv List of Figures

Fig. 2.13 Structural needs and new challenges ............................... 47
Fig. 2.14 Challenges and opportunities generated by the singularity
of the cooperative business model .................................. 48
Fig. 2.15 Increase in total investment needs on the Bazancourt-Pomacle
site between 2000 and 2011 ......................................... 50
Fig. 2.16 Summary of the value chain upstream and downstream
of processing .......................................................... 50
Fig. 2.17 Initial investment for the creation of CRISTANOL in 2006 . . . . . 51
Fig. 2.18 Changing structure of the cooperatives and joint subsidiaries . . . 52
Fig. 2.19 Financial structure of the Bazancourt-Pomacle site in 2012 . . . . . 53
Fig. 2.20 Increased diversification of the companies on the
Bazancourt-Pomacle site in the agro-food industry
value chain ............................................................ 56
Fig. 2.21 Development strategy upstream of processing ..................... 57
Fig. 2.22 Turnover on the Bazancourt-Pomacle site, 2000–2011 ........... 58
Fig. 2.23 Application of TRL to the Bazancourt-Pomacle site .............. 60
Fig. 2.24 BIOAMBER: challenge, obstacle and solution .................... 62
Fig. 3.1 Relations between the Bazancourt-Pomacle biorefinery and its
environment. The interaction between the biorefinery and
the member-farmers of the cooperatives is called an
“agro-system” ......................................................... 71
Fig. 3.2 Flows of products, by-products and services between firms
(It should be noted that the dehydration unit backs onto the sugar
factory and operates outside the sugar production period)
at the Bazancourt-Pomacle biorefinery, Champagne-Ardenne . . . 73
Fig. 3.3 Water flows (borehole water and processed water, steam
and water originating in biomass) between the firms of the
Bazancourt-Pomacle biorefinery, Champagne-Ardenne.
The percentages indicated represent the proportion of each
flow in comparison with all the water entering the system ....... 76
Fig. 3.4 Waste flows at the Bazancourt-Pomacle biorefinery,
Champagne-Ardenne. The percentages indicated represented
the proportion of each flow in comparison with all the water
entering the system ................................................... 77
Fig. 4.1 BA 112: 160 ha of land usable for an experimental farm ........ 90
Fig. 4.2 Overall view of the Sohettes-Val des Bois business park on
#
completion ( CCI Reims-Epernay – 4 vents – agency no. 3,
adapted by the authors) with its location in relation to the
existing biorefinery ................................................... 93
Fig. 4.3 Representation of prospects for extending activities around
the biorefinery ......................................................... 95