Page 173 - Biosystems Engineering
P. 173

152    Cha pte r  F o u r

               were determined: water content in substrate, soil water potential, soil
               water diffusivity coefficient in substrate, heat-diffusion coefficient, ther-
               mal conductivity of the substrate, heat-transfer coefficient from the
               heating pipe to the surrounding substrate, heat-transfer coefficient in
               free convection flow (for horizontal surface), mass-transfer coefficient in
               free convection flow (for horizontal surface), time, and source function.
                   In addition, an experiment was carried out in a greenhouse where
               pepper was cultivated. The substrate consisted of peat, tree bark, and
               pearlstone. The watering system in the soil bed was switched off for the
               duration of the experiment. The climatic parameters inside the green-
               house (temperature and air humidity) were monitored throughout the
               experiment, as well as substrate temperature, moisture, and leaf sur-
               face.  Additionally, the radiation intensity (sunshine) was measured
               inside the greenhouse. Microclimate parameters inside the greenhouse
               were measured 1 m above ground level. The comparison between mea-
               sured and calculated values revealed considerable convergence. The
               RMSE between the analyzed values did not exceed 0.73°C (tempera-
                             3
               ture) and 0.003 m m  (moisture content). The tests demonstrated a high
                                –3
               correlation between the predicted values and the measured values, with
               coefficients of correlation (R) of 0.94 (temperature) and 0.91 (moisture
               content). The observed differences could be due to the adoption of sim-
               plified conditions, homogeneity, and isotropy of the studied substrate.
                   The complexity of the physical phenomenon studied makes it diffi-
               cult to offer explicit equations to determine the capacity to be installed in
               heated substrates. To overcome such difficulties, Rodriguez et al. (2004)
               used experimental techniques combined with appropriate estimation
               methods that led to broad-based practical knowledge of that phenome-
               non. The parameters on which the proposed solution was based were
               defined by variables such as the power of the heating cable to be used or
               its depth and spacing. Dimensional analysis was applied because of the
               complexity of the energy transfers occurring in the substrate.
                   The method proposed by the authors combined heat-transfer theory
               with data obtained experimentally through dimensional analysis,
               and allowed for simple estimation of the parameters that defined the
               heating design: depth, spacing, and power per unit length of the elec-
               tric cable. A number of variables were required for estimation, among
               which were thermal properties of the substrate, ambient temperature,
               and substrate temperatures required to grow the relevant crop.
                   Later, Fernandez et al. (2005a) developed a two-dimensional FEM
               model using a general-purpose finite element code (ANSYS) that was
               capable of describing the thermal state of substrates heated by electric
               cable based on the geometry of the heating system and on the thermal
               properties of the substrate and insulator. This model allowed for (1) the
               introduction of different properties of compaction and moisture, and
               mixture of materials in the modeled substrate, (2) the transient analysis
               of the system, showing the two-dimensional distribution of tempera-
               tures at each step, and allowing heat-flow assessment, and (3) the use
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178