Page 192 - Biosystems Engineering
P. 192

GIS-Based W atershed Modeling Systems       171

               variety of purposes, including design of soil conservation practices, water
               table management, prevention of chemical pollution of surface bod-
               ies of water and groundwater, protection of aquatic biota, and devel-
               opment of TMDLs. In the years ahead, worldwide, watershed models
               will play an increasing important role in managing NPS pollutants.

               5.2.2  Origin of Watershed Models
               Because NPS pollutant transport is mainly driven by meteorological
               events, the early to mid-20th century saw the development of math-
               ematical descriptions of individual hydrologic components [e.g.,
               infiltration, runoff, evapotranspiration (ET), and interception]. The
               digital revolution of 1960s witnessed the integration of individual
               hydrologic components (Singh and Woolhiser 2002) into functional
               models that can be applied at various spatial and temporal scales.
               Initially, the models were developed and applied at point and field
               scales. However, it was quickly realized that, to truly address NPS
               pollution, watershed-scale models are needed. The development of
               watershed-scale hydrologic and NPS models in the United States
               began in response to the CWA (Arnold and Fohrer 2005). Examples of
               these models include the Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution
               Model (AGNPS) (Young et al. 1987), Annualized AGNPS (AnnAGNPS)
               (Bingner and Theurer 2003), Hydrologic Simulation Program—Fortran
               (HSPF) (Bicknell et al. 2001), the Kinematic Erosion Model (KINEROS)
               (Woolhiser et al. 1990), and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)
               (Neitsch et al. 2002).

               5.2.3  Characterization of Watershed Models
               Models in general and watershed models in particular can be charac-
               terized as mechanistic or empirical (based on the cognitive value of a
               model), stochastic or deterministic (based on the character of results
               obtained), linear or nonlinear (based on the mathematical properties
               of the operator function), event or continuous simulation, and lumped
               or distributed parameter model (Haan et al. 1982).
                   Truly mechanistic models are those in which governing physical,
               chemical, and biological laws and the model structure are well known
               and can be described by mathematical equations. Empirical models
               are used when model structure and governing laws are unknown or
               the mechanistic model is so complicated that simplification of model
               behavior is needed. In reality, most current watershed-scale models
               have mechanistic and empirical components. Further, most make an
               attempt to model physical, chemical, and biological processes that
               occur on land or in bodies of water (e.g., streams, ponds, lakes, or
               reservoirs). These models are best described as process-based mod-
               els. If any of the variables in a process-based model is regarded as a
               random variable having a probability distribution function, the model
               is called a stochastic model. However, if all of the variables are free
               from random variations, then the model is a deterministic model.
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197