Page 344 - Biosystems Engineering
P. 344

Food Safety Management       321

               strategies. Risk assessment can be used to set FSOs and POs. Current
               world and EU trade legislation highlights the need for food safety and
               quality to be addressed along the entire food chain. Increased empha-
               sis is placed on international collaboration to ensure safe food across
               boundaries and on what is now a global food market. International
               policy advocates risk assessment as a tool to evaluate risk and also to
               evaluate risk management strategies. Risk assessment is regarded as
               essential for managing food safety issues and can act as an extension or
               validation of HACCP. Important elements yet to gain exposure within
               food safety management are the establishment of FSOs on the basis of
               ALOP or other public health goals, as well as the possible enforcement
               of POs (or FSOs) or related PCs, standards, and control measures.
                   The evolution of food safety management has occurred at an
               uneven pace, propelled at times by the public and by governmental
               concern about food safety; it has been restrained in some cases by
               limitations of technical knowledge, data, and resources. The global
               harmonization of food safety regulations is necessary to ensure a safe
               supply of food and to ensure fair and transparent competition among
               countries in terms of trade. In light of this, risk assessments are being
               used as tools to help manage risk and to help make policy decisions.
               These have a significant impact on the importing and exporting of
               goods to and from a country. Movement of animals and their prod-
               ucts has long been recognized as having the potential to spread infec-
               tion. For the facilitation of trade, international trade agreements such
               as GATT and NAFTA have specified requirements for risk assess-
               ment in their sanitary and SPS agreements. For animal health, SPS
               measures are the most important, allowing countries to give food
               safety and animal health priority over trade requirements only if a
               scientific basis can be demonstrated (ICMSF 1998). Although each
               country can determine the level of risk appropriate to its own condi-
               tions, this must be based on defendable assessments available for
               objective evaluation. These factors have resulted in increasing num-
               bers of risk assessments being completed for increasing numbers of
               trade situations. Guidelines and other documents produced by
               CODEX have become reference standards for international trade. It is
               clear that all stakeholders from farm to fork play a role in ensuring
               food safety. Current food safety legislation highlights the importance
               of food safety controls that are scientific and proportionate to the
               risks and emphasize the need to protect public health in a way that is
               effective, proportionate, and based on risk analysis.


          References
               Allio, L., Ballantine, B., and Meads, R. 2006. Enhancing the role of science in the
                  decision–making of the European Union. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
                  44(1):4–13.
               Aruoma, O. I. 2006. The impact of food regulation on the food supply chain.
                  Toxicology 221:119–127.
   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349