Page 328 - Cam Design Handbook
P. 328

THB11  9/19/03  7:33 PM  Page 316

          316                      CAM DESIGN HANDBOOK

          11.1 INTRODUCTION

                      “All models are wrong. Some models are useful.”—George Box
               “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.”—Albert Einstein


             Engineering  modeling  is  the  art  of  reducing  a  physical  system  to  a  mathematical
          description in order to analyze system performance. Unlike many familiar problems in
          mathematics and engineering, the problem of producing a mathematical model for a given
          system does not possess a unique solution. Many models of various degrees of complex-
          ity and detail can be derived for any physical system, and the selection of the right model
          for a given purpose can at times seem a bit overwhelming. The concepts of usefulness and
          simplicity outlined in the quotes above prove to be helpful guides when faced with such
          a challenge. As the quotes above suggest, the goal is rarely to create the most detailed or
          realistic model conceivable, but instead to produce a representation that captures the details
          of interest in a simple, concise manner. Transforming a system from physical reality to a
          set of equations invariably involves some simplification in the description and some uncer-
          tainty in the measurement or calculation of model parameters. Since it is therefore impos-
          sible to reproduce the physical system perfectly in the mathematical world, the proper
          evaluation of a model’s quality is really an evaluation of its usefulness and not its detail.
          The operative question thus becomes: can the model explain the behavior it was devel-
          oped to explain to the degree of accuracy desired?
             Given a choice among models that pass this test of usefulness, there are often advan-
          tages to using the simplest possible representation. These advantages stem not from com-
          putational efficiency (after all, many commercially available computer codes allow the
          engineer  to  build  multibody  dynamic  models  of  cam-follower  systems  that  are  more
          complex than those discussed here), but rather from the engineering insight provided by
          simple models. Often, simple models enable the engineer to develop analytical results that
          save time in the design process. Instead of running a battery of simulations on a complex
          model to see how the frequency of an oscillation in the system varies with the length of
          one element, a simple model could provide an algebraic relationship indicating that the
          frequency changes with the square root of the length. Simple models also enable the engi-
          neer to apply intuition from very simple systems (for instance, the idealized mass-spring-
          damper)  to  more  complex  systems  (such  as  an  automotive  valve  train). The  danger  is
          that the model will be too simple and some relevant behavior will be ignored. In the design
          of engineering systems, therefore, different models with varying complexity each have a
          role  to  play.  Complex  models  offer  the  comfort  of  additional  completeness  and  a
          closer match to experiment while simple models provide intuition and a means of sepa-
          rating primary and secondary effects. Knowing which model to use when is indeed a chal-
          lenge, but one that can be greatly reduced with the help of a few concepts discussed in later
          sections.
             This chapter provides the basic tools necessary to produce dynamic models of cam-
          follower systems (and many other mechanical systems), simplify the models through some
          physical  arguments,  and  roughly  assess  whether  or  not  such  models  are  useful  or  too
          simple. The models developed may be used to analyze dynamic phenomena (Rothbart,
          1956) such as cam hop (where the cam and follower actually separate), the dynamic forces
          that occur in each component, and the noise generated by the system while in operation.
          The particular modeling approach taken is known as “lumped parameter” modeling since
          the physical characteristics of components are combined, or lumped, to produce simpler
          representations. All components of the cam-follower system possess some mass or inertia,
          exhibit  some  compliance  or  spring-like  behavior,  and  dissipate  some  energy  from  the
          system. For modeling purposes, it is convenient to separate these effects into a series of
   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333