Page 143 - Carbon Capitalism and Communication Confronting Climate Crisis
P. 143

11  BEARING WITNESS AND THE LOGIC OF CELEBRITY …  133

            role of media in relation to protest and social movements. Of particular
            interest is his focus on the media-savvy repertories of contention enacted by
            political actors.
              In developing his perspective Cammaerts cites della Porta and Diani’s
            (2006, p. 17) argument that there are “three distinct, but not mutually
            exclusive, logics that activists ascribe to their protest actions when deciding
            from the available repertoire of action” (Cammaerts 2012, p. 121). Each of
            these logics is underwritten by a reflexive awareness, or at least a ‘lay
            theory’, of which actions will receive media coverage and what kind of
            coverage it is likely to be (McCurdy 2011).
              First, the “logic of numbers”, is most commonly expressed through mass
            demonstrations. As a tactic for claiming attention however, filling the
            streets with marchers has become routinised and predictable in both its
            execution and the media reporting it attracts.
              The second logic, the “logic of damage”, involves the threat or enact-
            ment of damage to either property and or/people. Here, Cammaerts
            (2012) rightly stresses the need to clearly differentiate both “conceptually
            and morally” between “violence—directed at people—and damage—di-
            rected at property” a differentiation too often lost in the resort to the
            catch-all label, ‘political violence’ in mainstream media discourse.
              In contrast, the third logic, the “logic of bearing witness to injustice” is
            firmly rooted in principles of non-violence. As della Porta and Diani argue,
            protest action underwritten by this logic is “…not designed to convince the
            public or decision makers that the protestors constitute a majority or a
            threat. Rather it seeks to demonstrate a strong commitment to an objective
            deemed vital for humanity’s future” (2006, p. 176). As exemplified by the
            head-in-the-sand installation described earlier, acts of witness now rou-
            tinely incorporate resonant images or spectacular and/or performative
            elements. Their currency is evident in the rise of media stunts and “image
            event” (Deluca 1999) protests. However, I would argue there is a fourth
            logic not initially discussed by della Porta and Diani (2006) nor expanded
            upon by Cammaerts: the logic of celebrity.
              The logic of celebrity is a modus operandi symptomatic and emblematic
            of living in media-saturated times. Recognizing celebrity as a logic
            acknowledges the extent to which, under contemporary conditions, the use
            of, or resistance to, celebrity involvement in protest can underwrite, orient,
            constrain or facilitate political action. The logic of celebrity operates
            whenever established celebrities, such as actors and musicians, are recruited
            to boost the visibility of a social cause and in the cultivation of “celebrity
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148