Page 183 - Carbon Capitalism and Communication Confronting Climate Crisis
P. 183

14  JOURNALISM, CLIMATE COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA ALTERNATIVES  177

            and among the public that any progress on climate change is going to be
            fought over bitterly and will be decided through conflict’, which ends up
            producing a real ‘blind spot’ with respect to solutions that can emerge out
            of design, technology or policy innovation.
              David Beers (2006), publisher of thetyee.ca, identified three different,
            but complementary approaches through which solutions-focused journal-
            ism can ‘catalyze concrete positive change.’
              The first is ‘living the solution’, in which individuals describe their own
            experiences with a particular form of behavioural, institutional or social and
            political change. Exemplary of this approach was The 100-Mile Diet in
            which Alisa Smith and James MacKinnon wrote about their attempt to live
            on a diet consisting only of food sourced within 100 miles of their home.
            The popularity of the online articles led to a best-selling book (Smith and
            MacKinnon 2007) and helped spawn a global movement devoted to
            dietary localization.
              Second, journalists can investigate and publicize innovative, local,
            small-scale experiments which are often highly successful but largely
            invisible to the broader public. In these cases, the analytic focus becomes
            questions of scale, reproducibility and barriers: if a specific practice, tech-
            nology or policy is so effective, how can it be applied more broadly, and
            what social, economic or political barriers are preventing such expansion?
              Finally, Beers noted the importance of exploring solutions in other
            jurisdictions, which are often neglected due to the parochial sensibilities
            (and shrinking resources) of mainstream newsrooms. Learning about and
            from other places can shake up public acceptance of the status quo, and
            enliven political debate about the full range of choices available to citizens
            and governments. How, for example, has Norway managed the develop-
            ment and governance of its energy resources (and the profits from them)
            compared to Canada? What might Vancouver learn from the cycling
            policies and infrastructure of Portland, Copenhagen or Amsterdam? While
            much of this information already exists in reports from NGOs and aca-
            demic studies, the creativity and expertise of journalists as storytellers,
            combined  with  their  ethical  and  professional  commitments  as
            fact-checkers, can give their reporting upon solutions a credibility and
            rhetorical appeal which can get the public interested, engaged and excited.
              Especially important for both Dembicki and Beers are the identification
            of points of possible compromise and consensus—‘moveable parts’—which
            are otherwise obscured by ongoing conflict between different stakeholders.
            One of the most surprising revelations for Dembicki in his series Greening
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188