Page 187 - Carbon Capitalism and Communication Confronting Climate Crisis
P. 187

14  JOURNALISM, CLIMATE COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA ALTERNATIVES  181

            consequences; keep in mind journalism’s distinct capacity for an indepen-
            dent gaze, one that separates it from propaganda or social movements
            (Calcutt and Hammond 2011). Cox’s criteria are also reasonably consis-
            tent with the recognized democratic functions of journalism in monitoring
            power, surveying the physical and social environment for threats to
            well-being, and facilitating inclusive societal conversation on matters of
            public importance (Hackett et al. 2013, p. 36).
              Fortunately, educators, researchers and practitioners who want jour-
            nalism to productively engage publics on climate politics, do not need to
            reinvent the wheel. Two relevant paradigms emerged during the 1990s and
            2000s respectively—civic (or public) journalism in the US, and peace
            journalism, internationally. Each generated a theoretical rationale,
            methodological guidance, pedagogical tools, some empirical evaluation,
            many on-the-ground projects—and a challenge to conventional journal-
            ism. Civic journalism (CJ; also known as Public Journalism) was born out
            of a widespread sense of democratic “malaise” and a “disconnect” between
            American publics, on the one hand, and politicians and media, on the
            other. Its core premise is the ethical and practical requirement for jour-
            nalism not simply to report elite statements or to reproduce official political
            agendas, but actively to help reinvigorate public life. Drawing on the
            theories of American pragmatist John Dewey and German philosopher
            Jurgen Habermas, newspaper editor Davis “Buzz” Merritt and New York
            University academic Jay Rosen mapped out this new model during the
            1990s, in the context of declining newspaper circulations and growing
            popular distrust of the press (see e.g. Merritt 1995; Rosen 1991). In some
            typical cases, news organizations (especially newspapers in mid-sized
            American cities) actively sponsored public discussions, ranging from
            neighbourhood pizza parties to town hall meetings, published information
            to animate such deliberation, and reported on the outcome. The idea was
            to engage publics and encourage them to articulate their concerns and
            priorities, and thereby to help set political and media agendas. The
            experiments carried out under the rubric of civic journalism—an estimated
            600 by 2002 (Rosenberry and St. John III 2010)—have received mixed
            assessments. Supporters tout improved deliberative processes for commu-
            nities, improved civic skills and favourable responses from citizens,
            responsive policy outcomes, expanded number of civic organizations, and
            broader inclusion of citizen voices in the news (Friedland and Nichols
            2002). Others are more skeptical about the spread and staying power of CJ
            within corporate media, or its influence on journalists’ professional
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192