Page 195 - Carbon Capitalism and Communication Confronting Climate Crisis
P. 195

15  AN INTERVIEW WITH ALAN RUSBRIDGER …  189

            BB: Would you say that one of the most relevant goals of the cam-
            paign was to see divestment of big foundations and corporations from
            fossil fuels, or else to trigger a serious and more informed debate
            about climate change and global warming?
            AR: Both. We did one to try and get people to divest … and that it seemed
            to be an important thing. But in the act of doing something that noisy and
            unusual and persistent in a newspaper, we hoped [it] would make people
            sit up and think about something in a way that just writing more news
            stories wasn’t necessarily going to do.

            BB: So far, more than a year after the campaign, are you happy with
            the results? Do you think you were expecting more?
            AR: I think the results are amazing… I think the place where it struck
            home was the city, where people hadn’t thought about this whole ‘stan-
            dard assets’ issue. It looked amazing when the Bank of England was
            interviewed by the BBC and used language that was almost identical to the
            language we had been using, and essentially he was waving a big red flag in
            the air and saying, “Okay, this is not going to be something that’s going to
            affect your investment portfolio this month or maybe next month but at
            some point in the medium term these companies are not going to be
            allowed to burn the assets that they have, and that is going to have financial
            implications.” And I think there were quite a lot of people who hadn’t seen
            it in that light before who began to think differently about the issue
            afterwards.
            BB: And so, for example, you feel the Gates Foundation started lis-
            tening more?
            AR: The Gates divested a very large sum of money out of Exxon. They did
            it quietly about a year later, but they did divest and it had to coincide with a
            time when oil prices were extremely low and that sort of cut both ways.
            The valuation of oil companies was looking rocky anyway so people were
            thinking, “Is this the greatest investment in the world?” But also, I think it
            wasn’t great for the renewables that oil suddenly became so cheap.

            BB: As a media reformer and scholar, I see how the lack of action on
            climate change can also be due to failure of the media. Do you agree?
            AR: Yeah… I think it’s part of the big question about the current
            financing… I mean, it’s not just financing… this was the biggest problem
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200