Page 58 - Carbon Capitalism and Communication Confronting Climate Crisis
P. 58

42  R. MAXWELL AND T. MILLER

            wonder that media scholars, commentators and school curricula have
            virtually nothing to say about media technology’s impact on the
            environment.
              In response, we began a research project over a decade ago that we
            hoped would disabuse media and communication experts of the idea that
            media, information and communication technologies are environmentally
            neutral. We have drawn on this research for this chapter, primarily from our
            book, Greening the Media, and a column of the same name published
            monthly at http://www.PsychologyToday.com. Our aim continues to be
            to spark new ways of thinking about media history, media industries and
            the connections between media usage, climate change and our health. Our
            specific focus here is on challenges for green citizens and their expectations
            of environmental organizations engaged in some form of activism, advo-
            cacy, or policy-oriented work.


                  THE ECOLOGICAL CRISIS AND THE TECHNOLOGICAL
                                     CHALLENGES
            Readers of the collection of essays will be familiar with the basic con-
            stituents of the ecological crisis:

              • global warming (climate change) caused by overproduction of carbon
                dioxide (CO 2 );
              • pollution, including industrial dumping, unabated and unregulated;
              • rapidly diminishing biodiversity, the “sixth great extinction” and the
                precipitous decline of biosphere integrity (loss of land and sea
                habitats).
            Climate and environmental scientists have different ways of explaining the
            ecological crisis, but they agree on one point: that since the industrial
            revolution people have dangerously tipped the balance between what the
            Earth can give to support human activity and what the Earth can safely
            re-absorb from those activities. This balancing function has been called the
            “scientific prerequisites for ecological sustainability” or, more simply, our
            “planetary boundaries” (Rockström et al. 2009a, b; Schauer 2003).
              Researchers who developed the model of planetary boundaries have
            shown that human industriousness has crossed four of the nine boundaries
                         1
            in their model, and that the transgression of two of the boundaries that
            are key to the resilience of life on the planet—climate change and biosphere
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63