Page 228 - Carbonate Facies in Geologic History
P. 228

Interpretation of Midcontinent Pennsylvanian Cyclothems           215


            ----- $" EL.'------------------------__ U'LAND
                                                                                  J
            IIIGJHD  ULl auT  AT  1'f.t.8lLll£O  ~
               Y 'AU.I   st&  L[Vt1.. J
            -~-~--------












               Fig. VII-8




               sylvanian except that perhaps the single basal limestones are more persistent. In
               contrast, the traditional explanation of midcontinent cyclothems has emphasized
               extensive east-west regression and transgression caused by extrabasinal sea-level
               fluctuation or by tectonic "tilting" or "bobbing" of the shelf. The reason for this is
               the much  wider  cyclic  shelf in  the  Midcontinent,  the  extensive  downcutting  of
               certain channels and the complexity of the section interpreted to represent initia-
               tion of transgression.
                  In  the  Midcontinent, conventionally the  base  of the cycle  is  marked  at  the
               most striking lithologic boundary; this is  commonly the base of a  channel  con-
               glomerate. This disconformity has been interpreted to represent a significant and
               sudden  sea-level  lowering.  A few  channels  in  the  Midcontinent  are  large  and
               widespread, filled with coarse conglomerate, and cut down through tens of meters
               of section. The beds above the channel are a mixed clastic and carbonate section
               interpreted to have formed  when the following  marine transgression  was  barely
               successful  in  overcoming clastic influx.  Many channels,  however,  may  represent
               merely meandering distributaries during periods in which regressive and progra-
               dational terrigenous sedimentation occurred. Mathews (1974, Figs. 16.1 and 16.7)
               compares the two interpretations.
                  The north-central Texas cycles and those of the Yoredales are conventionally
               portrayed  to  begin  with  a  widespread  marine  limestone  whereas  those  of  the
               midcontinent United States are conceived to commence with a variable section of
               limestones and terrigenous clastics.
                  If the lower part of the Kansas megacyclothems actually represents a part of a
               prograding regressive  sequence,  the  Midcontinent, Y oredale, and  north  central
               Texas patterns are very similar.  In any event, the triplet of coal,  thin  limestone,
               and  black  shale  appearing  in  the  basal  Y oredale  and  in  the  middle  or  basal
               Kansas megacyclothem represents the most inundative and stable phase of sedi-
               mentation  and  hence  the  best  time-stratigraphic  marker  in  these  complex  sec-
               tions.
                  Other Pennsylvanian cyclothems occur farther west and south in  the  Rocky
               Mountain  areas.  They  continue  far  out  into  the  desert  southwest  and  up  the
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233