Page 234 - Carbonate Facies in Geologic History
P. 234

Facies Sequence in the Permian Reef Complex                       221

               ent facies, must be a response to a different pre-Permian tectonic framework; no
               basement faults are known to border the northern edge ofthe basin.
                  In the Guadalupe Mountains the western rim of the Permian Delaware basin
               is a fairly narrow accumulation of massive carbonate fronted by thick foreset beds
               which dip 30 degrees into the basin. Vertical depositional relief, that can be seen
               by tracing these beds  down  the front  into the basin,  increases stratigraphically
               upward to almost 700 m in the latest Permian. In the great canyons of the Guad-
               alupes, the shelf margin can also be seen to have been built out basinward several
               kilometers as it grew upward. The same stratigraphic pattern is visible around the
               Delaware  basin  in  the  subsurface  (Fig. VIll-4).  Subsidence  in  the  basin  nearly
               managed  to  keep  pace  with  carbonate  accretion  on  the  shelves  throughout
               Permian  time.  The  rate  of  sinking  increased  slowly  until  the  carbonate  shelf
               margin was  almost vertical. This is a common occurrence in carbonate bank or
               platform history.  Behind the rim, well-bedded strata of an evaporitic shelf envi-
               ronment developed. Regional facies patterns (Fig. VIII-5) are presented by Galley
               (1958), Hills (1972), and Meissner (1972).



               Facies Sequence in the Permian Reef Complex

               Several major works have described in detail the successive facies belts developed
               along the relatively narrow shelf margin (King,  1948;  Newell  et aI.,  1953; Dun-
               ham, 1972). Tyrell (1969) also described in detail the facies  along the uppermost
               stratigraphic unit which can be traced from  the shelf across the margin and into
               the basin. Earlier, Hickox (in Newell et aI.,  1953) traced and described a backreef
               bed, Yates A Dolomite. Further details were added by Achauer (1969). The strati-
               graphic succession and nomenclature of the shelf and basin deposits is  outlined in
               Fig. VIII  -6. The interpreted facies belts are reproduced as Fig. VIII -7.  The facies
               belts have been more or less standardized into generally recognized units and the
               outcrops of the Permian Reef Complex in the Guadalupe Mountains have been
               developed  into  a  classic  model  for  carbonate  shelf margin  facies.  Various  un-
               solved  problems  exist,  however,  as  to exactly  how  some  of the facies  fit  in  the
               original depositional profile. This is principally because of the great relief, inaces-
               sibility of many of the canyons and massive character of the "reef' itself.  These
               circumstances have to date almost prohibited the detailed section measuring and
               sampling necessary to careful tracing of rock types and the clarification of facies
               transitions despite  the  spectacular  mountain  outcrops.  It is  a  tribute  to  those
               persons who have  accomplished  part of this  arduous work that a  more  or less
               coherent  pictures has  emerged despite  the field  difficulties.  The facies  belts  are
               generalized in Table VIII-I.
                  The Permian strata also  display  a  variety of sedimentary structures  created
               during both deposition and diagenesis. (See comparison with the Triassic in this
               Chapter.) These strata illustrate beautifully the depositional facies across a typical
               narrow shelf margin (less than 10 km wide) with a steep (25-30°) edge and great
               vertical relief (700 m). These marginal belts separate a wide carbonate platform or
               ramp from a deeply subsiding basin. Application of the model to other carbonate
               facies complexes should be restricted by the consideration that: (1) the sediments
   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239