Page 43 - Carbonate Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy
P. 43

34                                       WOLFGANG SCHLAGER


                             Sea cliffs                      ly, cliffs in carbonate rocks retreat particularly fast and the
         Sea cliffs are not restricted to carbonate rocks but they are adjacent abrasion platforms are nearly devoid of debris from
       particularly common in limestones and dolomites. Sea cliffs rockfall.
       form by wave erosion in the uppermost subtidal and the in-  The spectacular and common appearance of cliffs on the
       tertidal zones. In carbonates, intertidal bioerosion adds to  modern carbonate shores constrasts sharply with the scant
       the power of wave erosion by undercutting the cliff and re- evidence reported from the distant past. Fig. 2.30 summa-
       moving the boulders on the abrasion platform. Consequent-  rizes personal observations from modern carbonate shores

           300
                theoretical denudation rates
                                                                  A) homogeneous, hard rock  B) ± homogeneous, soft rock
           250


           200

           denudation (mm ky -1  )  150                           C) inhomogeneous rock,


                                                                      seaward dip of profile depends on orientation of bedding
           100


            50



                    500   1000  1500   2000   2500  3000
                                             -1
                    precipitation - evapotransporation (mm y  )
          Fig. 2.29.— Denudation rates of karst surfaces. Lines represent  Fig. 2.30.— Shape of the cliff profile as a function of anatomy
         rates calculated with the model of White (1984) that assumes net  of the rock and dip of the bedding. Based on field observations of
         precipitation, CO 2 content of the meteoric water, and temperature  B.W. Fouke and the author.
         to be the three most important controls. Some observed rates
         plotted with mean and standard deviations fit the model fairly well.
         After Dreybrodt (1988), modified.





























        Fig. 2.31.— Influence of bedding on cliff profile – an example from Exuma Islands, Bahamas. Rocks are Pleistocene eolianites
       that consist of harder and softer layers. Where bedding is flat, a near-vertical cliff develops; the varying hardness of the layers
       only shows in the rugged outline of the cliff. In the lower part, where bedding dips seaward, the weathering profile follows the
       bedding. Photo courtesy of D.F. McNeill.
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48