Page 180 - Chemical equilibria Volume 4
P. 180

156     Chemical Equilibria
                           A1.2.3. Convention (II)
                             Convention (II) (known as the infinitely-dilute solution reference)
                           distinguishes, amongst the components of the solution, the substance (or
                           substances) present in high proportion, known as the solvents, and those
                           which are present in smaller proportions – the solutes. The reference state is
                           different for these two categories of components:

                             – For a solvent, we choose its pure state (in the same state of aggregation
                           as the solution) as a reference, and therefore its  chemical potential obeys
                           relation [A1.9]. Convention (II) is identical to convention (I) in the case of a
                           solvent.
                             – For a solute, the reference state is an imaginary solution in which all the
                           solutes are infinitely dilute. The reference chemical potential is, therefore, that
                           of the solute in that imaginary solution, and is written as  μ s ∞   for a solute s.
                           The activity coefficient of the solute s in that imaginary solution is equal to 1.
                           Thus, for solute s, the chemical potential is written as follows, agreeing that
                           the activity tends toward 1 if the molar fraction tends toward zero:
                                 μ s  = μ s ∞  + Rlnγ (II) x s                          [A1.10]
                                           T
                                                s

                           A1.2.4. Relation between conventions (I) and (II)

                             The activity coefficients of a solute in reference (I) (pure substance) and
                           reference (II) (infinitely-dilute solution) are linked to one another because
                           the chemical potential of the solute is independent of the convention chosen.
                           Therefore, we can write:

                                      0
                                 μ s  =  g + Rlnγ s (I) x = μ s ∞  + Rlnγ s (II) x s    [A1.11]
                                           T
                                                            T
                                      s
                                                  s
                             If we let  K  represent Henry’s constant, defined by the relation:
                                       iH
                                        μ ∞  − g 0
                                 ln K  =  s   s                                         [A1.12]
                                    iH
                                          RT
                           from this, we deduce:
                                   γ (I)  μ ∞  − g 0
                                 ln  s  =  s   s  =  ln K                               [A1.13]
                                   γ s (II)  RT       iH
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185