Page 100 - Cinematic Thinking Philosophical Approaches to the New Cinema
P. 100

6




             Glauber    Rocha
             Hunger    and  Garbage


             JAMES  PHILLIPS
             The trouble with most films of the left  is that they are not truly revolutionary. The
             revolutionary cinema should stimulate not the conformity of the public but the revolt
             of the public. A film  like Z, for instance, is very Hollywoodian. I think a truly revolution-
             ary film  is Godard's  Weekend because it  is a film that  provokes the public.
                                               —Glauber Rocha'*


             A  LATE SLOGAN  from  the  Brazilian  filmmaker  and  critic  Glauber
        Rocha reads: "The subject  is KYNEMA." To interpret this, encouraged  by
        the  eccentric orthography,  as simply the  declaration  of an  aesthete would
        be an  error.  Rocha's entire work  constitutes  an  exposition  of the  political
        essence of cinema. Formalism  is the mark of the revolutionary  filmmaker,
        since,  for  Rocha,  cinema  is properly cinema when  it is political and prop-
        erly political when  it takes  itself as theme.
             Of  course,  all  cinema  can  be  said  to  be  political  inasmuch  as  it  in-
        evitably  encodes  a political  position.  In  most  instances,  however,  cinema
        is  political  merely  by  extension:  it  is no  more  than  a  means  of  commu-
        nication  of  an  independently  existing  politics.  Cinema  only  comes  into
        its  own  when  it  contests  this  subordination  and  participates  in  the  sus-
        pension  of instrumental  rationality  that,  following  Hannah  Arendt,  is a
        trait  of the  political  realm.  This  suspension  of instrumental  rationality  is
        improperly  understood  as  the  affair  of  aestheticism,  since  in  its  refusal
        to  engage  in  political  struggles  aestheticism  colludes  with  reaction  and
        subserves  its ends  (as Rocha  reveals  in  his condemnations  of  Hollywood,
        a transcendent  theme can  always be found  for the purportedly  immanent
        world  of  illusionist  cinema).  Hence  film  takes  itself  as  theme  precisely
        when  it forbids  itself the  specious  liberties  of make-believe. The theme  of
        cinema  is the  freedom  of cinema  itself.
             Yet  cinema  cannot  enter  on  this  freedom  so  long  as the  masses  are
        exploited and the earth  laid waste, because by jumping ahead  of the revo-
        lution,  cinema  anticipates  a  freedom  that  is  simply  the  corollary  of  illu-

        90
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105