Page 31 - Cinematic Thinking Philosophical Approaches to the New Cinema
P. 31

Alfred  Hitchcock  21

        ishment,"  Hitchcock's  films  deliver;  yet  more  often  they  punish  woman,
        mans victim,  for her association with the abject  threat of Mother  Natures
        revenge. His films are littered with female  corpses, associated with  animal-
        ity, food,  and death. Just  as fqod  is served in nearly every film, women  are
        served up  as dishes  (in Mamie,  Marks  sister-in-law,  Lil, asks him,  "Who's
        the  dish?"  in  reference  to  Marnie):  Janet  Leigh  is  covered  in  chocolate
        sauce "blood"  for her black-and-white  demise in the shower; the sound  of
        the knife being plunged  into her naked body  is the sound of a knife  being
        plunged into a melon; and  as Tania Modleski points out, the grotesque as-
        sociations between women and food  in Frenzy are the basis of the so-called
                             25
        black humor of the film.  More specifically,  in Frenzy women's corpses are
        compared to the animal parts that the inspector's wife feeds him: fish heads
        and pigs' feet.  In these films from  the  1960s and  early 1970s, through  both
        visual  and  narrative  conceits,  women's  bodies,  particularly  women's  dead
        bodies, are compared  to  dead  animals  or animal parts: Marion  Crane  and
        the  stuffed  and  painted  birds  from  Psycho;  Melanie  Daniels  and  the  evil
        and  dead  birds  from  The Birds (not  to  mention  her  fur  coat  that  catches
        the attention  of every man  she passes); Marnie  as the wild  animal  hunted,
        caught, and  domesticated  by Mark  Rutland;  Rusk's victims in Frenzy, one
        stuffed  into  a  potato  sack,  whose  bodies  are  interchangeable  with  dead
        cooked animal parts, suggesting cannibalism  humor.
             In  The Birds it  is the mother who had  been  eating chicken with  her
        kids in the restaurant who  blames Melanie  for  the bird attacks. After  the
        birds attack the gas station across the street, the women, huddled in a hall-
        way, stare at Melanie, and the mother  becomes hysterical, accusing Mela-
        nie  of being  the  cause  of the  attacks  and  calling  her  "evil." The  mother
        screams at Melanie, "Who  are you?  What  are you?" and Melanie slaps her
        face.  The  mother's  "What  are you?" suggests that  Melanie  is not  human
        but some kind of monster or animal that incites the bird attacks. The con-
        nection  throughout  the  film  between  Melanie  and  the  birds,  and  Mrs.
        Bundy's lecture on how  it isn't natural  for  birds to  be aggressive,  suggests
        that Melanies  aggressive behavior toward Mitch  is not natural. She is not
        passive  like  a good  "bird"  should  be;  she  has  left  her  gilded  cage,  flown
        to  Bodéga  Bay, and with  the  fury  of Mother  Nature  herself,  is wreaking
        havoc on  even innocent  children.
             Perhaps the most troubling representation  of mothers and  daughters
        in  Hitchcock's  films,  however,  comes  in  Marnie,  where  the  daughter  is
        constantly  compared  to  a wild  animal,  studied,  hunted,  trapped,  raped,
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36