Page 101 - Color Atlas of Biochemistry
P. 101

92        Metabolism



             Enzyme kinetics I                                enzymes whose substrate saturation curves
                                                              are shown in diagram 1, enzyme 2 has the
                                                                                                        –1
             The kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions       higher af nity for A [K m = 1 mmol  l );
             (i. e., the dependence of the reaction rate on   V max , by contrast, is much lower than with
             the reaction conditions) is mainly determined    enzyme 1.
             by the properties of the catalyst. It is therefore  Since v approaches V asymptotically with
             more complex than the kinetics of an uncata-     increasing values of [A], it is dif cult to obtain
             lyzed reaction (see p. 22). Here we discuss      reliable values for V max —and thus for K m as
             these issues using the example of a simple       well—from diagrams plotting v against [A]. To
             first-order reaction (see p. 22)                 get around this, the Michaelis–Menten equa-
                                                              tion can be arranged in such a way that the
                                                              measured points lie on a straight line. In the
             A. Michaelis–Menten kinetics
                                                              Lineweaver–Burk plot (2),1/v is plotted
             In the absence of an enzyme, the reaction rate v  against 1/[A]. The intersections of the line of
             is proportional to the concentration of sub-     best fit with the axes then produce 1/V max
             stance A (top). The constant k is the rate con-  and—1/K m . This type of diagram is very clear,
             stant of the uncatalyzed reaction. Like all cat-  but for practical purposes it is less suitable for
             alysts, the enzyme E (total concentration [E] t )  determining V max and K m . Calculation meth-
             creates a new reaction pathway. Initially, A is  ods using personal computers are faster and
             bound to E (partial reaction 1, left). If this   more objective.
             reaction is in chemical equilibrium, then
             with the help of the law of mass action—and
                                                              B. Isosteric and allosteric enzymes
             taking into account the fact that [E] t =[E] +
             [EA]—one can express the concentration [EA]      Many enzymes can occur in various conforma-
             of the enzyme–substrate complex as a func-       tions (see p. 72), which have different catalytic
                                                              properties and whose proportion of the total
             tion of [A] (left). The Michaelis constant K m
             thus describes the state of equilibrium of the   number of enzyme molecules is influenced by
             reaction. In addition, we know that k cat >k—in  substrates and other ligands (see pp.116 and
             other words, enzyme-bound substrate reacts       280, for example). Allosteric enzymes of this
             to B much faster than A alone (partial reaction  type, which are usually present in oligomeric
             2, right). k cat ,the enzyme’s turnover number,  form, can be recognized by their S-shaped
             corresponds to the number of substrate mol-      (sigmoidal) saturation curves, which cannot
             ecules converted by one enzyme molecule per      be described using the Michaelis model. In
             second. Like the conversion A   B, the forma-    thecaseofisosteric enzymes (with only one
             tion of B from EA is a first-order reaction—i. e.,  enzyme conformation, 1), the ef ciency of
             v = k  [EA] applies. When this equation is       substrate binding (dashed curve) declines
             combined with the expression already de-         constantly with increasing [A], because the
             rived for EA, the result is the Michaelis–       number of free binding sites is constantly
             Menten equation.                                 decreasing. In most allosteric enzymes (2),
                In addition to the variables vand [A], the    the binding ef ciency initially rises with in-
             equation also contains two parameters that do    creasing [A], because the free enzyme is
             not depend on the substrate concentration        present   in  a   low-af nity   conformation
             [A], but describe properties of the enzyme       (square symbols), which is gradually con-
             itself: the product k cat  [E] g is the limiting  verted into a higher-af nity form (round sym-
             valuefor the reaction rateata very high [A],     bols) as a result of binding with A. It is only at
             the maximum velocity V max of the reaction       high [A] values that a lack of free binding sites
             (recommended abbreviation: V). The Michae-       becomes noticeable and the binding strength
             lis constant K m characterizes the af nity of the  decreases again. In other words, the af nity of
             enzyme for a substrate. It corresponds to the    allosteric enzymesisnot constant, but de-
             substrate concentration at which v reaches       pends on the type and concentration of the
             half of V max (if v = V max /2, then [A]/(K m +  ligand.
             [A]) = 1/2, i. e. [A] is then = K m ). A high af nity
             of theenzymefor a substrate thereforeleads
             to a low K m value, and vice versa. Of the two


           Koolman, Color Atlas of Biochemistry, 2nd edition © 2005 Thieme
           All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106