Page 195 - Communication Processes Volume 3 Communication Culture and Confrontation
P. 195

170  Badri Narayan

                  The version popular among the lower castes mentions the pro-
                posal by a higher-caste girl to a lower-caste male, while the latter is
                projected as a righteous youth. Thus, punishing Chuharmal, despite
                his blameless morality, instead of punishing Reshma, leads us to
                many inferences. First, this act is regarded as an anti-religious act by
                lower-class mentality. Second, it shows that the saviour of religion
                had become the violator of religious principles. Third, through this
                narrative the lower castes want to project the degeneration within
                feudal culture.

                Text D
                Some people keep the memory of Chuharmal alive in yet another
                form. According to them, there was a time when thieves and cowherds
                used to destroy crops. Then an incarnation of the mighty Chuharmal
                came forth, who ‘annihilated the destroyers of our crops’. Because of
                this food is offered first of all to Chuharmal in the month of Chaitya.
                  According to this version, Chuharmal is a symbol of goodness. He
                was the saviour of the people’s crops. Hence, people of this area pre-
                serve his memory in a divine form. This connects them with Chuharmal
                and his tradition. This memory of Chuharmal is usually preserved
                among the middle castes.


                Memory of Protest and Protest by Memory


                People of the area remember the narrative not as myth, but as a real
                incident. Heinrich Zimmer (1957) rightly says that myth is simul-
                taneously real as well as unreal. A myth does not remain a myth
                because, instead of a god or demon who are the usual heroes of myths,
                ‘a man’ has become its hero. To transform itself into myth and link
                with primordial memory many a times a worldly symbol is identified
                with supernatural powers. Ranjit Guha (1995) shows to this effect
                that subalterns adopt as their gods some of those who are established
                as evil by the Great Tradition and become their worshippers. In this
                context, after a lucid explanation of the myth of Rahu, he mentions
                that Rahu—who is a demon in the ‘Samudra Manthan’ (Churning
                of the Ocean) narrative of the Mahabharata, and who is assumed as
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200