Page 277 - Communication Processes Volume 3 Communication Culture and Confrontation
P. 277

252  P.J. Amala Dos

                virtue of the money that he has, he gives us some advance, anything
                from Rs 5,000 to 10,000 for the whole of the year, according to the
                roles that we play in folk art forms. Basically, he gets us as bonded
                labour and we work under him. We do not know even how much money
                he gets paid. Suppose he gets  Rs 10,000 for a programme, he then
                hardly gives a few thousand rupees to the artists. We do not benefit from
                it, since we have already taken an advance from him. If we ask him for
                it, we will be beaten up by goondas (thugs). We basically experience
                exploitation at the hands of agents.
                  If artists approach television and radio, the government’s ‘popular
                media’, they face a similar problem. The culture of commission and the
                rigid rules of the central and state government media do not allow us
                programmes easily. The Federation, many groups and I myself have
                registered protests challenging TV authorities and the quality of TV
                folk forms. They just employ people with no relation whatsoever with
                the folk arts, resulting in very awkward programming  The state does
                not take care of the real folk artists, or even contact us, and prefer to
                cater only to the elite.
                  NGOs, by virtue of the academic qualifications of the workers, fi-
                nance and other means, learn some of the tunes and body movements
                of the folk forms, and take upon the right to act as folk artists. This is
                just exploitative, as they are able to perform for the government and
                various educational institutions instead of the real artists. That said,
                there are genuine researchers and we do have respect for them.
                  In Tamil Nadu there is a well-known and notorious artist called
                Vijay Lakshmi. She is given Rs 33,000 for one show. For the same
                programme, which will last a number of hours, we are given a mere
                Rs 3,000. Moreover, we have to lobby hard for being given the chance of
                performing and earning a commission. This is exploitation as well.
                  There is also exploitation by consumers. Let us take very popular
                forms like karakattam (girls’ dance), leather puppetry or other popular
                song forms, and there are many of them, in which women take part.
                If in my troupe I have young attractive girls, then I am more likely to
                be given a programme.
                  In this context, instead of taking upon themselves the role of the
                artists, the role of the NGOs in using folk media has to be limited as
                providers of information to folk artists and as facilitators to help them
                use the given information to make folk forms that can create awareness
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282