Page 47 - Communication Processes Volume 3 Communication Culture and Confrontation
P. 47

22  Guy Poitevin

                     alien subject prompted by a will to power through accumula-
                     tion of the past in order to modify it as per one’s own models.
                     Re-appropriation, capitalization and conquest are the attributes
                     of the script to the service of states or hegemonic classes.

                  The relevance and extent of the difference which oppose the spoken
                oral traditions and their written textual re-fabrication may further be
                stressed in reference to three typical sets of socio-cultural processes
                that often support processes of domination (Irigaray 1985). They can
                be distinctively articulated as follows:

                  1.  First, with regard to the mode of transmission, the written tends
                     to overwrite the oral, the script turns the speech obsolete, the
                     print puts the voice aside, the text obliterates the body, the lan-
                     guage makes the gesture redundant. ‘This results in putting at a
                     distance the lived body (traditional and individual) and, there-
                     fore, also all that in the people remains bound to the soil, to a
                     place, to orality and non-verbal tasks’ (de Certeau 1990: 205).
                  2.  Second, with regard to the carriers, the educated agent represses
                     the illiterate vulgar. Learning to write in school is the initiation
                     par excellence into a progressive, capitalist and developing
                     society. The modelling of a modern child is essentially achieved
                     by scriptural proficiency. Literacy increasingly becomes the
                     basic asset of social hierarchy and discrimination and imparts
                     all privileges nowadays to the technocrats as yesterday it did to
                     the ‘bourgeois’. Control over language patterns and linguistic
                     material (rhetoric or mathematic) is for the dominant classes
                     the medium of their reproduction and, on the whole, the key to
                     social distinction, authority and power.
                  3.   Third, with regard to the gender parameter, the written remains
                     often a prerogative of the male as one more asset to overpower
                     the female (Irigaray 1985). Accordingly, women’s literacy
                     allegedly becomes the key factor of women’s uplift and liberation
                     (in the image of men’s ascendancy).

                  Often these three sets jointly operate as united domination patterns
                under the guise of the superiority of the classical and written—the
                pure and refined—over the popular and the oral—the crude and rough.
                Critical queries are particularly relevant here:
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52