Page 20 - Communication Theory and Research
P. 20

McQuail(EJC)-3281-01.qxd  8/16/2005  11:58 AM  Page 9




                  Introduction and Overview                                             9

                  branch of critical enquiry largely parted company from the political economic
                  school, leading to separate publications and a cessation of dialogue across the
                  divide. It also moved to a position where popularity (variously defined) became
                  a criterion of merit and a guide to understanding. The political economic school
                  was to some extent vindicated by the large changes to media systems referred to
                  above that were driven by technology, economics and politics more or less in that
                  order. The major shift towards privatization of ‘broadcasting’ and of the telecom-
                  munications sector required a sophisticated understanding of the economics of
                  the case as well as the technology. For the cultural school, there was at least the
                  relative novelty in Europe of popularly driven abundance of media culture. The
                  Internet has opened a large range of opportunities for both ‘schools’, although it
                  is probably more relevant to note that it has stimulated its own branch of enquiry,
                  with new ideas and models, that is not rooted either in the political economic or
                  the popular cultural tradition.



                  The public sphere

                  The notion of a ‘public sphere’ was widely seized on during the 1990s, especially
                  following the translation of Habermas’ seminal study (1962) into English (1989).
                  It offered something of an escape route from the seemingly hopeless pursuit of
                  the goal of more ‘democratic media’. Commercial media were flourishing and
                  expanding and the one main sector of the media that was democratically
                  accountable (public broadcasting) was either declining or failing in its perceived
                  public duties. A wider concept of a sphere of free publication, discussion and
                  debate within a larger ‘civil society’ seemed a more realistic and still worthwhile
                  goal, despite its somewhat mythic origins and its elevation of rational discourse
                  above emotion and popular feeling (Dahlgren, 1995). It was essentially an
                  old-fashioned notion, but it was seen as having a potential for renewal and to
                  provide some solid ground for societal claims against the media and for erecting
                  new structures (for instance in cyberspace). The notion also appealed to those
                  emerging from the stern grip of communist regimes and into the embrace of
                  commerce. For a mixture of reasons, but especially a general response to ‘commer-
                  cialization’ of media, the public sphere notion has remained in play as a viable
                  basis for a theory of media–society relations.




                  Communication policy

                  The various technological and system changes that have been mentioned as
                  taking place in Europe during the last twenty-five years have to some extent been
                  the result of new policies on the part of national governments and of the European
                  Union (especially in its search for an integrated market in media as in other sectors).
                  Where not policy-led, it has been aided and legitimated by policy, opening up an
                  expanding field of enquiry. Previously, communication policy was largely confined
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25