Page 31 - Communication Theory and Research
P. 31

McQuail(EJC)-3281-02.qxd  8/16/2005  11:58 AM  Page 20





                     20                                         Communication Theory & Research

                                                              Dimension of transnationalization

                                          Total trans-
                                          nationalization in  Multilaterally  Bilaterally  Nationally
                                          country, region, or  distributed  distributed  distributed
                           OBJECT         social group    television   television  television

                           SUPPLY         T-S             T(m)-S:1;2   T(b)-S:1;2  T(n)-S:1;2;5
                                                          T(m)-S/CO:   T(b)-S/CO:  T(n)-S/CO:
                                                          1;2;3        1;2;4      1;2;5;6
                           CONSUMPTION    T-C             T(m)-C:1;2   T(b)-C:1;2  T(n)-C:1;2;5
                                                          T(m)-C/CO:   T(b)-C/CO:  T(n)-C/CO:
                                                          1;2;3        1;2;4      1;2;5;6

                          FIGURE 2.2  SUMMARY OF MEASURES OF TRANSNATIONALIZATION
                          1: hours;2: share of total;3: share of multilateral;4: share of bilateral;5: share of national;
                          6: share of imports.

                         effects considered; and (3) to agree on definitions and the operationalization of
                         the effects.
                           The proposed measures of transnationalization are summarized in Figure 2.2.



                         Future Research

                         It is indisputable that much more systematic empirical research is needed on the
                         consequences of international television flows. Speculation and guesswork
                         dominate the contemporary scene, and the practice of cross-cultural commu-
                         nication is far ahead of knowledge of its effects.
                           Future research must relate to some kind of generally accepted framework
                         along the lines suggested here. First- and second-level effects must be clearly
                         separated. The dimensions and subjects of transnationalization must be specified
                         and related to programme contents, consumption, perception and gratification.
                         Local and regional television and bilaterally and multilaterally distributed
                         television must be incorporated and much more work must be undertaken to
                         identify the determinants of transnationalization of supply, together with the
                         receiver-oriented determinants of consumption, and of course the cultural, economic
                         and social consequences of this consumption. The role of commercialization for
                         both ‘first- and second-’ level effects must be given an especially high priority in
                         research.
                           These general recommendations can be implemented both in public and
                         private audience research and in individual projects. Substantial developments
                         in research on international television flows can only be achieved by broad
                         international approaches undertaken or sponsored by international organizations –
                         preferably UNESCO – since studies limited in scope to individual countries are
                         of less use. If, however, predominantly impressionistic material continues to
                         result from the more global approach to research that is recommended here, then
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36