Page 200 - Communication Theory Media, Technology and Society
P. 200

Holmes-06.qxd  2/15/2005  1:03 PM  Page 183





                                                                    Telecommunity  183
                  our orientation toward objects as sources of the self, of relational intimacy,
                  of shared subjectivity and of social integration’ (9).
                      However, for Knorr-Cetina, the relationship of individuals to tech-
                  nology isn’t just a matter of ritual, although this is strong, but of turning
                  everyday objects like commodities and instruments into knowledge
                  objects in ways that become meaningful as such. Where the propensity of
                  a particular individual to do this (which may vary according to gender
                  and age) is either resisted or too intense, it attracts a label – technophobia
                  or addiction (see Brosnan, 1998).
                      In Knorr-Cetina’s work, where the notion of solidarity is brought into
                  the scenario of an object-centred sociality, it also needs to be epistemically
                  grounded and not only ritually derived (19). In other words, having an
                  epistemic intimacy with the object is important, not just the routine ritual
                  of ‘using’ it as a means to some end. And indeed, in post-social societies,
                  Knorr-Cetina claims that such an intimacy is beginning to eclipse intimacy
                  with other human beings.
                      Consider the following statement from William Mitchell (1996) about
                  his personal use of the Internet:

                     The keyboard is my café. Each morning I turn to some nearby machine – my
                     modest personal computer at home, a more powerful workstation in one of
                     the offices or laboratories that I frequent, or a laptop in a hotel room – to
                     log into electronic mail. I click on an icon to open an ‘inbox’ filled with
                     messages from round the world – replies to technical questions, queries for
                     me to answer, drafts of papers, submissions of student work, appoint-
                     ments, travel and meeting arrangements, bits of business, greetings,
                     reminders, chitchat, gossip, complaints, tips, jokes, flirtation. I type replies
                     immediately, then drop them into an ‘outbox,’ from which they are for-
                     warded automatically to the appropriate destinations. If I have time before
                     I finish gulping my coffee, I also check the wire services and a couple of
                     specialized news services to which I subscribe, then glance at the latest
                     weather report. This ritual is repeated whenever I have a spare moment
                     during the day. (7)
                  What emerges here is that, whilst the meetings, the travel, the ‘content’,
                  the business of institutional life vary from day to day, the technological
                  ritual of clicking on is constant, enduring and cathartic.


                  Digital intimacy


                  Theories of object-relations are not entirely new, and have had a long-
                  standing tradition in psychoanalytic theory. But few have related such
                  theories to a transition from one kind of social form to another, or to the
                  significance of media as relationship partners. One such theorist, referred
                  to by Knorr-Cetina, is Sherry Turkle, who manages to combine both a
                  concern for social change and an attachment to digital technology.
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205