Page 169 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 169

158 COMMUNICATION AND CITIZENSHIP


            Figure 1 The three public spheres in Poland








            Szarzyński 1989).  Since  the introduction of  martial law,  some 500
            underground publishing houses have released over 3,000 books (cf. also
            Gajewski 1988). In trying to describe the media of the opposition public
            sphere, Piotr Szarzyński (1989, p. 1) wrote at the beginning of 1989:

              [They] are committed to fighting the Communists to a different
              degree. Some openly call for a confrontation ‘here and now’; others
              publish works of fiction  not  directly connected to  the political
              struggle. Some have adopted a clearly defined and comprehensive
              political programme; others rarely go beyond a blanket rejection
              of every aspect of contemporary reality and are interested mainly
              in ‘socking it to the Commies’.

            Thus,  there were  few  basic differences between  the alternative and
            opposition public spheres in general orientation and attitude. However,
            the  former has been prevented  by  censorship, and probably by the
            policy of the Church itself (oriented as it is to long-term survival and
            expansion), from openly  questioning the fundamental tenets of  the
            system or advocating its overthrow. The latter has sought to draw up a
            blueprint for a new socio-political system for Poland. We believe that this
            is a difference not of degree but of kind.
              The three public spheres could be represented as in Figure 1.
              The audiences of the media forming part of the three public spheres
            are not mutually exclusive. Therefore the audiences of the three public
            spheres can be represented as in Figure 2.
              Both the alternative and opposition media can be said to have actually
            assumed that most of their readers would also follow the official media
            and to  have concentrated on  the  kind of content which could  not  be
            found elsewhere. And so, for example, in 1980–1, items and articles on
            previously taboo  historical issues  took  the second  largest amount of
            space in Solidarity periodicals.
              Of course, these are schematic representations. The other two public
            spheres do not begin to compare with the official one in terms of size
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174