Page 82 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 82

GOODBYE, HILDY JOHNSON 71

                 Hamilton, 1981 and 1984. The most influential statement of the ‘decline
                 of partisanship’ thesis is by Colin Seymour-Ure in Chapter 8 of his The
                 Political Impact of the Mass Media, London: Constable, 1974.
              7 That is Koss’s key distinction, for example at op. cit., vol. i., pp. 16–17.
              8 This is most  vividly illustrated in  the case of  external threats to the
                 national elite. The case of Northern Ireland is very well known but it is
                 not unique. Fred  Halliday concluded a study of the British  media
                 coverage of a colonial war in Dhofar in the 1970s by arguing that ‘The
                 Oman story is therefore  a particularly  striking case  of press collusion
                 over many years in a case where strategic interest, commercial advantage
                 and  publishing timidity interlocked’  (‘New management and counter-
                 insurgency’, in  J.Seaton and B.Pimlott  (eds),  The Media in  British
                 Politics, Avebury-Gower, 1987, p. 199).
              9 Koss, op. cit, vol ii, pp. 657–8, quotes, and dismisses much too readily, a
                 version of this explanation advanced by Richard Crossman in 1952.
              10 See  L.Chester, S.Fay and H.Young,  The Zinoviev Letter: A  Political
                 Intrigue,  London: Heinemann,  1967. The  authors, journalists, write:
                 ‘This (high) degree of political commitment was the  single  most
                 significant feature of the newspapers in the ‘twenties. Political prejudice,
                 and sometimes political ambition,  was the motivation underlying  the
                 opinions of most proprietors, and expression of prejudice was almost the
                 raison d’être of their papers. Reporting an approximation of the truth was
                 subordinated recklessly to a determination to get some message across’
                 (pp. 128–9). This might stand as a fair comment on the material recorded
                 by  James Curran in  Media  Coverage of  London Councils: Interim
                 Report, London: Goldsmiths’ College Media Research Group, 1987, and
                 which claimed: ‘Our conclusion is that not one of  these stories is
                 accurate. A few appeared to have been conjured out of thin air; the rest,
                 although loosely connected with some basis of fact, have got important
                 details wrong and are misleading’ (p. 1).
              11 This stance by the Independent was certainly important and I will return
                 to its implications below.
              12 Geoffrey Goodman, ‘Not one  national  paper backs Labour’,  New
                 Statesman,  9  January 1987, p. 14. In  the  event there  were  two
                 equivocating supporters. The Alliance did even worse with  only one.
                 Readers were, in general, fairly well aware of the political views of their
                 chosen papers, although  those papers with large  working-class
                 readerships and Tory politics recorded low percentages of  awareness
                 (Bob Worcester, ‘Trying the food on the dog’, New Statesman, 24 July
                 1987, p. 13).
              13 Raymond Williams’s work, and in particular his essay ‘The press and
                 popular culture’, in Boyce et al., op. cit., is the classic development of
                 this idea. Williams, and the present writer, tend to argue the case in terms
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87