Page 88 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 88

SELLING CONSENT  77

              Feature news treatment consisted of discussions, specialist-interviews
            and often exhortation, about crime, drug abuse, good health practices,
            family  conflict, education, sexual problems,  employment, the
            environment and consumer complaints. Since these topics are perennial,
            they are recycled regularly, sometimes in the form of a short series, or a
            monthly ‘drive’ that orchestrates various formats, from specials to short
            announcements to news segments. Although many of these topics raise
            heated controversy,  such as  abortion or nuclear hazards, the
            overwhelming tendency is to preserve an  atmosphere of  upbeat
            optimism. If hard news is bad news, then local public affairs features
            tend to be good news, or at least comforting information.
              Controversy can be addressed in editorials, which are usually one- or
            two-minute talking heads, the head often that of the station manager or
            the public affairs director, if there is one. Another NAB survey, with a
            sample  of 422  stations, found  that less  than one-third bother  to
            editorialize and that of these less than 3 per cent will actually endorse a
            candidate in a contested election.  So, although the occasional station,
                                       16
            like KPIX-TV in San Francisco, may occasionally take an unpopular
            position it believes in, most stations play it safe for fear of alienating
            viewers or of  triggering  equal-time rebuttals  from  sources that will
            surely alienate viewers, for whose loyalty all this localism is expended.
              Boosting  the  status quo  cannot be  left to on-air activities. General
            managers,  like executives of  any business  that depends  on public
            acceptance, spend a great deal of time attending civic affairs, visiting
            schools, speaking at ceremonies. The better stations make sure that their
            on-air talent, which is the key  to news  and  public affairs ratings,  is
            visible in  the flesh for public affairs  and local charities.  Stations
            themselves sponsor dinners for the elderly, music concerts, park and zoo
            days for families, fund-raising ball games with their  own employees
            participating. Weather reporters are increasingly fitting a central casting
            type of the all-purpose warm community person, visiting schools and
            hospitals with some sort of science or health presentation. 17
              Since all of these strategies, on- and off-air, are often common within
            the same market, the competition  for ratings among  local stations
            revolves around two intangibles: the personalities of the talent and the
            perception of the station as ‘the’ local station. Hiring charismatic talent
            is still much of a mystical operation, with successful producers referring
            to  ineffable visceral cues as the determining factor. Scarcely open  to
            rational discussion, the star factor is thus underemphasized in studies of
            programming  strategy. The other factor—competitive edge in local
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93