Page 160 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 160

137                        Historical  Materialism

         perspective  of  an  observer,  from  which  they  view  the  system  of  their
         expectations  and  actions  from  the  outside,  as  it  were.  Otherwise  they
         could  not  conditionally  link  their  reciprocal  expectations  and  make
         them,  as  a  system,  the  basis  of  their  own  action.14
           b.  Social  roles  can  be  constituted  only  if  the  participants  in  interac-
         tion  possess  a  temporal  horizon  that  extends  beyond  the  immediately
         actual  consequences  of  action.  Otherwise  spatially,  temporally,  and
         materially  differentiated  expectations  of  behavior  could  not  be  linked
         with  one  another  in  a  single  social  role.  Burial  rites  are  a  sign  that
         living  together  as  a  family  induced  a  categorically  expanded  con-
         sciousness  of  time.15
           c.  Social  roles  have  to  be  connected  with  mechanisms  of  sanction  if
         they  are  to  control  the  action  motives  of  participants.  Since  [in  the  first
         human  societies}  the  possibility  of  sanction  was  no  longer  (as  in  pri-
         mate  societies)  covered  by  the  accidental  qualities  of  concrete  reference
         persons  and  was  not  yet  (as  in  civilizations)  covered  by  the  means  of
         power  of  political  domination,  it  could  consist  only  in  ambivalently
         cathected  interpretations  of  established  norms.  As  can  be  seen  in  the
         way  that  taboos  function,  interpretive  patterns  tied  to  social  roles  re-
         worked  the  feeling  ambivalence,  which  must  have  resulted  from  de-
         differentiating  the  drive  system,  into  the  consciousness  of  normative
         validity,  that  is,  into  readiness  to  respect  established  norms.1®

           For  a  number  of  reasons  these  three  conditions  could  not  be
         met  before  language  was  fully  developed.  We  can  assume  that
         the  developments  that  led  to  the  specifically  human  form  of
         reproducing  life—and  thus  to  the  initial  state  of  social  evolution
         —first  took  place  in  the  structures  of  labor  and  language.  Labor
         and  language  are  older  than  man  and  society.  For  the  basic
         anthropological  concepts  of  historical  materialism  this  might  im-
         ply  the  following:

           a.  The  concept  of  social  labor  is  fundamental,  because  the  evolu-
         tionary  achievement  of  socially  organized  labor  and  distribution  obvi-
         ously  precedes  the  emergence  of  developed  linguistic  communication,
         and  this  in  turn  precedes  the  development  of  social  role  systems.
           b.  The  specifically  human  mode  of  life,  however,  can  be  adequately
         described  only  if  we  combine  the  concept  of  social  labor  with  that  of
         the  familial  principle  of  organization
           c.  The  structures  of  role  behavior  mark  a  new  stage  of  development
         in  relation  to  the  structures  of  social  labor;  rules  of  communicative
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165