Page 195 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 195

172                        Communication  and  Evolution  of  Society

         in  the  learning  of  new  cognitive  structures  or  identification  and
         projection  in  the  construction  of  a  motivational  basis.  As  long
         as  these  mechanisms  are  not  adequately  analyzed,  however,  we
         cannot  judge  whether  the  comparison  between  mutation  and  tra-
         dition  is  merely  metaphorical  or  whether  the  underlying  social
         learning  mechanism  is  in  some  ways  functionally  equivalent  to
         the  process  of  mutation.  One  difference  should  arouse  our  sus-
         picion;  whereas  the  mutation  process  produces  chance  variations,
         the  ontogenesis  of  structures  of  consciousness  1s  a  highly  selective
         and  directional  process.



         b.  In  natural  evolution  the  success  of  learning  processes  is  mea-
         sured  against  the  ability  of  a  population  to  stabilize  itself  in  a
         given  environment;  and  the  reproduction  of  the  species  depends,
         in  the  final  analysis,  on  the  individual  organism’s  ability  to  sur-
         vive.  We  can  specify  in  turn  unambiguous  parameters  for  the
         ability  of  an  organism  to  avoid  death.  This  is  not  the  case  for
         the  ability  of  a  society  to  avoid  death;  it  is  not  even  clear  what
         this  is  supposed  to  mean.  The  physical  survival  of  a  number  of
         members  sufficient  for  reproduction  is,  of  course,  a  necessary
         condition  for  a  society's  maintaining  its  identity—but  it  is  not  its
         sufficient  condition.
           The  identity  of  a  society  is  normatively  determined  and  de-
         pends  on  cultural  values;  on  the  other  hand,  these  values  can
         change  as  the  result  of  a  learning  process.  There  is  no  clearly
         specifiable  goal-function  against  which  the  ultrastability  of  soci-
         eties  could  be  measured.  Dunn  gives  the  following  formulation
         to  this  state  of  affairs:


         The  appropriateness  of  novel  behavior  is  tested  by  its  contribution  to
         goal  convergence.  If  it  fails  that  test  it  will  usually  fail  to  win  a  per-
         manent  place  in  the  behavioral  repertoire.  However,  the  failure  to
         generate  goal  convergence  may  not  only  cause  the  new  behavioral
         mode  to  be  identified  as  maladaptive,  it  may  also  call  into  question  the
         appropriateness  of  the  goal.  In  short,  just  as  the  goals  form  the  test  of
         adaptive  behavior  giving  rise  to  the  revision  of  behavioral  ideas,  be-
         havioral  ideas  sometimes  form  a  test  of  the  adequacy  of  goals  and  lead
         to  goal  revision.8°
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200