Page 24 - Communication Commerce and Power The Political Economy of America and the Direct Broadcast Satellite
P. 24

Introduction                     11

           Commission's  (FCC's)  initial  DBS  licensees,  granted  in  the  early
           1980s, failed to establish viable services. More generally, the historical
           and structural conditions that had produced  an ensemble  of federal
           agencies  incapable of making  and implementing cohesive  and long-
           term  foreign  communication  policies  were  unintentionally  made
           even  less  effective  through  reform  efforts  involving  neo-liberal  re-
           regulatory developments during this period. While the Reagan admin-
           istration  attacked  established  international  institutions,  intra-state
           efforts  to  coordinate  US  foreign  communication  policy  better
           remained lacking primarily due to the absence of  an undisputed leader
           among state agencies.  The Office of the United States Trade Repre-
           sentative (USTR) and its expanding mandate to reform international
           trade  institutions emerged  to fill  this  vacuum.  By  the  mid-1980s,  a
           complex overlapping of communications with trade policy had taken
           root.  Free-flow policy aspirations now were  to be achieved  through
           free  trade.  US corporations directly concerned with free  flow  devel-
           opments  considered  this  trade  approach  to  be  a  viable  means  of
           overcoming  foreign  resistance,  while  other  American  companies
           came to recognize themselves to be increasingly dependent on trans-
           national communication capabilities.
             Inadequate US policy-making structures led to a foreign commun-
           ication policy crisis and the compulsion to restructure the American
           state. In Chapter 6,  'Exporting Liberalization and the Ascendancy of
           Trade,' this complex and often problematic process is related both to
           agency and structure involving a growing demand, initiated by mostly
           US-based fmancial services, computer services and telecommunication
           equipment  companies,  for  the  neo-liberal  re-regulation  of domestic
           and international activities. A remarkable effort driven by the private
           sector to promote the ideals of competition and trade reciprocity for
           information-based  products  and  services  emerged  from  this.  These
           forces  and  this  crisis  also  involved  the  ascent  of the  USTR  as
           America's front-line state agent, both promoting free trade and resist-
           ing foreign  and international legal  precedents that could be used  to
           retard future communication policy aspirations.
             A push to include service sector activities and intellectual property
           rights in the Uruguay Round GATT negotiations subsequently con-
           stituted the core international institutional reform pursued in efforts
           to  redress  the  American  foreign  communication  policy  crisis.  And
           while  DBS  plans  and  applications  played  a  marginal  role  in  what
           turned out to be  a  generally  successful  strategy,  the emergence  of a
           de  facto  international  free  flow  regime  through  trade-based
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29