Page 92 - Communication Commerce and Power The Political Economy of America and the Direct Broadcast Satellite
P. 92

Foreign  Communication  Policy and DBS: 1962-1984   81

           'harmful interference,'  for  instance,  was  emphasized and  the  Brazil-
           ians called for consultations between nation states to prevent the entry
           of unwanted  satellite  signals.  In  1963,  an  Extraordinary  Adminis-
                                     28
           trative Radio Conference was convened by the ITU in response to the
           formation  of Comsat and  the immediate need  to  allocate frequency
           bands for  space communications.  With Soviet support,  the US  dele-
           gation  received  frequency  allocations  from  the  ITU for  the  experi-
           mental  development  of  telesatellites. 29   Increasingly,  however,
           telesatellite  issues  were  considered  to  be  broadly  'political'  rather
           than narrowly 'technical.' For example, until the prospective feasibil-
           ity of DBS technology was widely acknowledged, transnational satel-
           lite communications had been coordinated by the ITU on a largely ad
           hoc  basis,  and  as  such  the  introduction  of  new  satellite  services
           through the  administration  of ITU engineers  primarily  involved  the
           protection  of existing  frequency  assignments.  With  DBS,  however,
           both  the  political  ramifications  of the  technology  and  its  relatively
           high research, development and implementation costs compelled ITU
           officials to move toward a planned use of the radio-wave spectrum.  30
           Instead of first-come-first-serve allocations, the prospect of DBS (and
           the  ITU's  responsibility  to  promote  universal  telecommunication
           developments,  among other factors)  led  the  Union to  adopt a  long-
           term planning regime. This shift in approach involved far more poli-
           tical  intrigue  than  past  decisions  based  largely  on  the  short-term
           calculations of engineers.
             In  1964,  following  a  report  by  the  UN  Scientific  and  Technical
           Subcommittee  of  the  Conference  on  the  Peaceful  Uses  of  Outer
           Space  (COPUOS),  which  concluded  that  DBS  transmissions  would
           be  technologically  feasible  within  ten  years,  the  UN Secretariat  put
           the COPUOS in charge of all prospective DBS issues.  One year later,
           the Brazilian delegate to an Outer Space Committee Working Group
           to Organize a UN Conference on Outer Space recommended that 'the
           question  of the  cultural  and  political  impact  of television  programs
           transmitted  by  artificial  satellites'  should  be  put  on  the  conference
           agenda. 31   By  1966,  requests  by  the  United  Arab  Republic  (UAR),
           Mexico  and Chile resulted in  the COPUOS commissioning a broad-
           based study on the  implications  of space  communications.  An  open
           political  conflict  ensued,  involving  delegations  from  countries  as
           diverse as the Soviet Union,  the UAR and France,  all  pushing for  a
           formal UN recognition that DBS activities require the accompanying
           development of a regulatory regime reaching beyond the mostly tech-
           nical  boundaries of the ITU. The United States often  stood alone in
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97