Page 50 - Communications Satellites Global Change Agents
P. 50

26                                                         PELTON

           Unbridled  technological  change,  instantaneous free-market globalism,  and e-
        commerce  on the Internet may very well contain doses of "teleshock" that cancel
        out the positive gains of "telepower." This book tries to explain not only the scope
        and type of satellite-driven change, but also where restraint  and prudent limits to
        electronic  technology  may  well be needed.  The  future  of satellites  and their  op-
        portunity for aiding future  generations are thus likely to be conditional. The chal-
        lenge  is  to  devise  "smarter  and  wiser"  systems  rather  than  simply  "faster  and
        broader-reaching"  networks.
           Recent  demonstrations  at  the  meetings  of  the  World  Economic  Forum,  the
        World Bank, the World Trade Organization,  and other forums where  technology,
        free trade, and capitalism are promoted have shown that the circle of concern  goes
        beyond  fundamentalist religious  zealots.  There  is  a  wide  range  of  critics  who
        would  like to  see  satellites  and  information  networks in  the  21st  century being
        marshaled  to create  new and more enlightened forms of modern  society, but not
        promote unbridled  technological  growth  as envisioned  by pro-technology  gurus
        (Fuller,  1971,  chap.  1). Labor  unions,  environmentalists,  social  reformers,  and
        others  fear  "teleshock" tremors  still to  come.
           We can indeed still use satellites, fiber, and innovative wireless technology  to
        create a new type of future  that transcends the goals of  19th-century capitalist-led
        democratic liberalism  as defined by Adam  Smith  and John  Locke.  As bright and
        intelligent as those political  economists  were in their day, their ideas are now out
        of  date.
          We could  indeed use some  innovative thoughts  about the interrelationship be-
        tween democracy and technology. We may well need to invent some new institu-
        tions and political  philosophies to cope with the 21st  century.  We probably  need
        to  sort out ways to use our  most  modern  of information technologies  in a better
        way. We may need to use our technology to fuel  societal and environmental pres-
        ervation rather than faster growth. We should move toward "electronic  decentral-
        ization"  so that we can move ideas rather than people and avoid the folly  of putt-
        ing all of our people  and resources  in huge and environmentally unsound  mega-
        structures  like the  World  Trade  Center.


        CHANGING  EDUCATION, HEALTH, DEMOGRAPHICS,
        AND  PATTERNS OF WORK
        We may need to use our technology  to re-instill intellectual freedom in education.
        Likewise  we may wish to use technology  to create  "smart market"  systems that re-
        connect supply and demand to meet  longer term social  and economic  goals  rather
        than  short-term profits. There  are many lessons  that the Enron collapse,  9/11, and
        the widening  ozone  hole in our atmosphere  can teach us if we would only listen.
        Better  use  of our  communications  systems  is just  one  of these  lessons.
          We could  use 21 st-century  satellite and fiber networks to restructure and im-
        prove the nature  of our cities, reinvent our institutions, and reinvent the fabric  of
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55