Page 156 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 156

P1: GCV/INL  P2: GCV
                          0521835356agg.xml  Hallin  0 521 83535 6  January 20, 2004  17:24






                                                       The Three Models

                                forsecuritiestradingirregularitiesafterfallingoutoffavorwithPresident
                                Aznar, who had installed him in that position. Berlusconi has faced
                                charges on a number of occasions in Italy. This obviously increases the
                                stakes for media owners – as for other private actors – in having strong
                                political ties and in seeing the appropriate faction prevail politically. On
                                the other side, media actors have the ability to pressure political fig-
                                ures by selectively exposing corruption, thus increasing incentives for
                                politicians to be concerned about control of the media. The patterns of
                                politicization, instrumentalization, and state intervention we have seen
                                previously are clearly rooted to a significant extent in these characteris-
                                tics of Southern European politics. As the example of Berlusconi’s ties to
                                the Socialist party suggest, the persistence of clientelism also means that,
                                although the state aspires to intervene strongly in the media sphere in the
                                Mediterranean countries, it often fails to act effectively: particularistic
                                ties weaken its ability to act in a centralized and consistent fashion, thus
                                contributing to the pattern of “savage deregulation” of broadcasting.
                                   Clientelism is also connected with a political culture that is relatively
                                cynical about the notion of a general public interest transcending partic-
                                ular interests. “Savagely closed to the external world,” as Bellah (1974)
                                putitinananalysisofItaly,thisculture“impliesformsofloyaltytofamily
                                and clan, to groups of pseudo family like the Mafia, to village and town,
                                to faction and clique . . . weakening every real commitment to liberal
                                democratic values.” This view of Italian political culture has been widely
                                criticized as too simplistic (e.g., Sciolla 1990). It ignores the high (though
                                uneven)levelofpoliticalengagementdiscussedpreviouslyandthestrong
                                value placed on plurality and debate, characteristics of Italian political
                                culture that were just in some sense reaching their peak when Bellah’s
                                essay was written. Nevertheless it is correct that an important element of
                                particularism in the political culture of Italy, as of other countries with
                                strong histories of clientelism, tends to undermine the notion of a tran-
                                scendent“publicinterest.”This,webelieve,isanimportantreasonforthe
                                slower development of journalistic professionalism in Southern Europe.
                                As we shall see in the following chapters, professionalization is connected
                                in the Liberal and Democratic Corporatist systems with the displace-
                                ment of earlier patterns of clientelism by rational-legal institutions.


                                                         CONCLUSION
                                The long and conflicted transition to capitalism and bourgeois democ-
                                racy in Southern Europe produced a media system closely tied to the


                                                              138
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161